Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/cpp-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/cpp-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/cpp-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/cpp-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00952 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00476 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00190 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
cpp-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to cpp-review — 15 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 140 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
C++ Code Review
This command invokes the cpp-reviewer agent for comprehensive C++-specific code review.
What This Command Does
- Identify C++ Changes: Find modified
.cpp,.hpp,.cc,.hfiles viagit diff - Run Static Analysis: Execute
clang-tidyandcppcheck - Memory Safety Scan: Check for raw new/delete, buffer overflows, use-after-free
- Concurrency Review: Analyze thread safety, mutex usage, data races
- Modern C++ Check: Verify code follows C++17/20 conventions and best practices
- Generate Report: Categorize issues by severity
When to Use
Use /cpp-review when:
- After writing or modifying C++ code
- Before committing C++ changes
- Reviewing pull requests with C++ code
- Onboarding to a new C++ codebase
- Checking for memory safety issues
Review Categories
CRITICAL (Must Fix)
- Raw
new/deletewithout RAII - Buffer overflows and use-after-free
- Data races without synchronization
- Command injection via
system() - Uninitialized variable reads
- Null pointer dereferences
HIGH (Should Fix)
- Rule of Five violations
- Missing
std::lock_guard/std::scoped_lock - Detached threads without proper lifetime management
- C-style casts instead of
static_cast/dynamic_cast - Missing
constcorrectness
MEDIUM (Consider)
- Unnecessary copies (pass by value instead of
const&) - Missing
reserve()on known-size containers using namespace std;in headers- Missing
[[nodiscard]]on important return values - Overly complex template metaprogramming
Automated Checks Run
# Static analysis
clang-tidy --checks='*,-llvmlibc-*' src/*.cpp -- -std=c++17
# Additional analysis
cppcheck --enable=all --suppress=missingIncludeSystem src/
# Build with warnings
cmake --build build -- -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic
Example Usage
User: /cpp-review
Agent:
# C++ Code Review Report
## Files Reviewed
- src/handler/user.cpp (modified)
- src/service/auth.cpp (modified)
## Static Analysis Results
✓ clang-tidy: 2 warnings
✓ cppcheck: No issues
## Issues Found
[CRITICAL] Memory Leak
File: src/service/auth.cpp:45
Issue: Raw `new` without matching `delete`
```cpp
auto* session = new Session(userId); // Memory leak!
cache[userId] = session;
Fix: Use std::unique_ptr
auto session = std::make_unique<Session>(userId);
cache[userId] = std::move(session);
[HIGH] Missing const Reference File: src/handler/user.cpp:28 Issue: Large object passed by value
void processUser(User user) { // Unnecessary copy
Fix: Pass by const reference
void processUser(const User& user) {
Summary
- CRITICAL: 1
- HIGH: 1
- MEDIUM: 0
Recommendation: ❌ Block merge until CRITICAL issue is fixed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 140 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A e89252e3e959
cpp-review is a command published in the GitHub repository loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes (270 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 952 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to cpp-review, differing in 15 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
cost-tracker
Track session costs, understand token spend, and get optimization tips.
dispatcher
Pick the next-best repo to work on across the portfolio — rank free repos, recommend one, claim its lease atomically, and route to the entry command.
standup
Show a daily standup summary with completed, in-progress, and blocked tasks across all active epics.
test
Run all PandaFilter verification steps in order. Stop and report on first failure. This is the required pre-commit gate.
dev-planner
Generate or update DEV-PLAN.md with phased development plan from Product-Spec.md.