Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add LovelaceLoom/gemini-plugin-cc/plugin install geminiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/lovelaceloom/gemini-plugin-cc/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lovelaceloom/gemini-plugin-cc/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lovelaceloom/gemini-plugin-cc/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lovelaceloom/gemini-plugin-cc/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lovelaceloom/gemini-plugin-cc/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00596 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00238 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00119 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
73% identical to review — 44 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Run a Gemini review of the local diff via the shared companion.
Raw slash-command arguments:
$ARGUMENTS
Core constraint:
- This command is review-only.
- Do not fix issues, apply patches, or suggest that you are about to make changes.
- Your only job is to run the review and return Gemini's output verbatim to the user.
Execution mode rules:
- If the raw arguments include
--wait, do not ask. Run the review in the foreground. - If the raw arguments include
--background, do not ask. Run the review in a Claude background task. - Otherwise, estimate the review size before asking:
- For working-tree review, start with
git status --short --untracked-files=all. - Inspect both
git diff --shortstat --cachedandgit diff --shortstat. - For branch review, use
git diff --shortstat <base>...HEAD. - Recommend waiting only when the review is clearly tiny, roughly 1–2 files total.
- In every other case, recommend background.
- For working-tree review, start with
- Then use
AskUserQuestionexactly once with two options, putting the recommended option first and suffixing its label with(Recommended):Wait for resultsRun in background
Argument handling:
- Preserve the user's arguments exactly. Do not strip
--waitor--background. - The companion script ignores
--wait/--backgroundflags itself; Claude Code'sBash(..., run_in_background: true)is what actually detaches the run.
Foreground flow:
- Run:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"
- Return the command stdout verbatim. Do not paraphrase, summarize, or add commentary.
- Do not fix any issues mentioned in the review.
Background flow:
- Launch the review with
Bashin the background:
Bash({
command: `node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"`,
description: "Gemini review",
run_in_background: true
})
- Do not call
BashOutputor wait for completion in this turn. - After launching, tell the user: "Gemini review started in the background. Check
/gemini:statusfor progress."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 58 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A d0c30982c29f
review is a command published in the GitHub repository LovelaceLoom/gemini-plugin-cc (4 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 596 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 73% identical to review, differing in 44 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-skills
Review changed skills: automated bash checks + 9 structural dimensions (D1-D9) + 5 intent checks (M1-M5). PASS/FAIL verdict. Fix in-place.
audit-project
Multi-agent code review with iterative improvement.
claude-loop
Use a fresh headless Claude session (Fable by default) as an independent reviewer of the whole repo, area by area (or of one branch's diff with --base), fix every real finding with regression tests, and loop until each area comes back clean twice in a row. The /codex-loop pattern on Anthropic usage. Runs autonomously.
pr-review
Reviews pull request changes to provide feedback, check for issues, and suggest improvements before merging into the main codebase.
code-review
Perform a comprehensive code review of recent changes.
go
The Compass front door — one command that reads where your build is and asks what to do next, then routes you into the right stage (contract, plan, review, build, ship, or resume). The simplest way to use Compass.