competitive-analysis

competitive-analysis is a command for Claude Code from lucasgaravelli/pm-skills-claude-code. It costs 0 tokens per session (3,022 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of competitive-analysis, MIT.

A command for comparing competitors’ strengths, weaknesses, features, and market gaps. It can produce a comparison table, a SWOT analysis, and positioning suggestions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Preparing a product requirements document, choosing features, defining product positioning, and planning a roadmap.
Why use it?
It organizes scattered competitor information so product teams can see where their offering differs and what may be missing.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

Good fit Preparing a product requirements document, choosing features, defining product positioning, and planning a roadmap.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/lucasgaravelli/pm-skills-claude-code/competitive-analysis
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lucasgaravelli/pm-skills-claude-code

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for competitive-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lucasgaravelli/pm-skills-claude-code/competitive-analysis.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/lucasgaravelli/pm-skills-claude-code/competitive-analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lucasgaravelli/pm-skills-claude-code/competitive-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lucasgaravelli/pm-skills-claude-code/competitive-analysis.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,022 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.03022
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.01511
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00604
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00302

Measured 8d ago against content hash 150c44b6f297, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

competitive-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to competitive-analysis — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/commands/competitive-analysis.md · 297 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 297 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/competitive-analysis

O que essa skill faz

Mapeia strengths e weaknesses de competitors, identifica gaps de diferenciação e recomenda posicionamento próprio.

Saída: Matriz competitiva com feature comparison, análise SWOT, e recomendações de diferenciação.


Quando usar

  • Preparando PRD ou estratégia e precisa entender mercado
  • Escolhendo entre features: qual os competitors têm?
  • Posicionando produto: onde está brecha no mercado?
  • Levantando barra para roadmap: o que é baseline vs inovação?

Input esperado

Mínimo:

  • Competitors: Lista de 3-5 players diretos ou indiretos
  • Seu produto: O que você quer ser (ex: "a melhor CRM para PMEs")
  • Contexto: Segmento de cliente, tipo de uso

Opcional:

  • Pricing de competitors
  • Feedback de clientes sobre alternativas
  • Market share ou dados públicos
  • Features que você quer entregar

Processo

  1. Feature matrix — Lista features core, compara quem tem, qualidade (1-5 stars)
  2. Análise SWOT própria — Strengths reais vs competitors, weaknesses, oportunidades
  3. Positioning — Onde você vence? Onde você perde?
  4. Gaps — Que features ninguém tem bem feito?
  5. Recomendações — Features prioritárias para diferenciação

Output

# Análise Competitiva: [Seu Produto]

## Competitors mapeados
- [Competitor A]: [Posicionamento], ${pricing}
- [Competitor B]: [Posicionamento], ${pricing}
- [Competitor C]: [Posicionamento], ${pricing}

## Feature Matrix

| Feature | [Seu Produto] | [Comp A] | [Comp B] | [Comp C] | Status |
|---------|-------------|----------|----------|----------|--------|
| **Core Features** | | | | | |
| [Feature 1] | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Paridade |
| [Feature 2] | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | Behind |
| [Feature 3] | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | Liderança |
| **Nice-to-haves** | | | | | |
| [Feature 4] | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | Gap |
| [Feature 5] | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Tabela |

## Análise SWOT (seu produto)

### Strengths (vs competitors)
1. **[Strength 1]** — Ninguém faz melhor
   - Exemplo: [Feature detalhada]
   - Diferenciação: [Por que importa para cliente]

2. **[Strength 2]** — Você está à frente
   - Exemplo: [...]
   - Diferenciação: [...]

3. **[Strength 3]** — Facilidades únicas
   - Exemplo: [...]
   - Diferenciação: [...]

### Weaknesses (vs competitors)
1. **[Weakness 1]** — Competitor X é melhor
   - Benchmark: Ele faz [feature]
   - Impacto: [X% de clientes mencionam como razão para deixar]

2. **[Weakness 2]** — Alguém domina esse espaço
   - Benchmark: [...]
   - Impacto: [...]

### Opportunities
1. **[Oportunidade 1]** — Gap no mercado que ninguém preenche bem
   - Evidência: Entrevista com clientes mencionou [problema]
   - Competitors: Ninguém tem solução boa para [X]

2. **[Oportunidade 2]** — Seu strength pode se expandir
   - Exemplo: Você é bom em [Y], pode estender para [Z]

### Threats
1. **[Threat 1]** — Competitor X está se movendo para sua feature
   - Sinal: [Recente hire, acquisition, roadmap rumor]
   - Tempo: [Estimado em quantos meses]

2. **[Threat 2]** — Novo entrant pode bater você
   - Por quê: [Startup bem fundada, grande tech company]
   - Janela: [X meses até ser competição real]

## Posicionamento recomendado

### Seu nicho
**[Seu Produto] é para [Segmento] que precisa [job], diferente de [Competitors] porque [diferenciação única].**

Exemplo de frase: "Acme é o único CRM específico para PMEs com integração nativa com WhatsApp e foco em performance em conexões lentas."

### Segmentos onde você vence
- [Segmento A]: Por causa de [Strength 1] e [Strength 2]
- [Segmento B]: Por causa de [Oportunidade 1]

### Segmentos onde você perde
- [Segmento C]: Competitor X é muito melhor em [Feature], que é critical aqui
- [Segmento D]: Pricing ou feature table não bate

## Features prioritárias para diferenciação

### Curto prazo (próximas 2-4 semanas)
1. **[Feature de catch-up]** — Fechar gap em [Weakness 1]
   - Por quê: Baseline obrigatória, clientes esperam
   - Tempo: [Estimado]
   - ROI: [X% de churn reduction se fechado]

2. **[Quick differentiator]** — Pequena feature que aproveita [Strength 1]
   - Por quê: Diferenciar sem muito investimento
   - Tempo: [Estimado]

### Médio prazo (próximos 2-3 meses)
1. **[Feature de diferenciação]** — Explorar [Oportunidade 1] que ninguém faz
   - Por quê: Criar novo valor único
   - Tempo: [Estimado]
   - Impacto: [Novo segmento, +X% market share]

2. **[Consolidação]** — Evoluir seu [Strength 2] de bom para imbatível
   - Por quê: Aprofundar vantagem competitiva
   - Impacto: [X% customer love, referrals]

## Conclusão

### Recomendação de estratégia
1. Fechar [Weakness 1] em [timeline curta] para ser tabela em feature
2. Acelerar [Oportunidade 1] para criar diferenciação clara
3. Monitorar [Threat 1] — estar pronto se competitor se mover

### Próximos passos
- Criar /prd para [Feature de diferenciação]
- Validar com clientes se [Oportunidade 1] é real (via entrevista)
- Monitorar roadmap de [Competitor X]

Read the full file on GitHub · 297 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 297 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 150c44b6f297

Subscribe to this mod's changes

competitive-analysis is a command published in the GitHub repository lucasgaravelli/pm-skills-claude-code (20 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,022 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to competitive-analysis, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.