Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/maxschottke-spec/seo-survival-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/maxschottke-spec/seo-survival-kit/recovery-full)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/maxschottke-spec/seo-survival-kit/recovery-full"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/maxschottke-spec/seo-survival-kit/recovery-full/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/maxschottke-spec/seo-survival-kit/recovery-full"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/maxschottke-spec/seo-survival-kit/recovery-full.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.03133 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01566 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00627 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00313 |
Grade A, and why
recovery-full scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 271 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Recovery Full Workflow
Zweck
Verkettung aller fuenf Recovery-Commands in einem Durchlauf (Diagnose -> Crawl -> Audit -> Plan -> Monitor). Ein Befehl fuer den vollstaendigen Recovery-Workflow von Diagnose bis Monitoring-Setup. Alle Schritte teilen eine gemeinsame run_id fuer end-to-end Traceability.
Change Governance
Keine Live-Aenderungen ohne expliziten Modus + Budget + Freigabe. Bei breiten Instruktionen wie "alles", "mach alles", "ALLESS": Hard Stop per SEO_CHANGE_GOVERNOR.md.
Vor jedem Write: Change Plan ausgeben. Nach jedem Write: Live QA + change-history.ndjson Eintrag. Budget-Tracking ueber die gesamte Session. recovery-audit muss VOR der ersten Schreiboperation laufen wenn change-history.ndjson existiert.
Settlement-Gate-Verhalten (Pflicht)
Wenn ~/.cache/seo-rescue/{slug}/recovery-gate.json mit settlement_gate_active: true existiert:
recovery-fulldarf keine Live-Aenderungen vorschlagen oder durchfuehrenrecovery-fulldarf nur folgende Schritte ausfuehren:- Diagnose (read-only)
- Crawl (read-only)
- Audit (read-only)
- Monitoring-Render (read-only)
- Re-Evaluation-Report
- Ticketliste fuer Rico / Entwicklung
- Plan-After-Gate-Dokument anstelle eines normalen Action-Plans
Wenn der User trotzdem Live-Aenderungen fordert
- Stop mit Begruendung
- Keine Ausfuehrung
- Konkrete Unlock-Kriterien aus
SEO_SETTLEMENT_GATE.mdsection 9 nennen - Standard Settlement-Gate Response aus
SAFE_LIVE_CHANGE_RULES.mdausgeben - Hinweis auf
next_allowed_review_dateaus dem Gate-Objekt
Plan-After-Gate-Dokument
Statt eines normalen Action-Plans erzeugt recovery-full bei aktivem Gate ein Plan-After-Gate-Dokument:
{
"type": "plan_after_gate",
"settlement_gate_active": true,
"live_changes_allowed": false,
"next_allowed_review_date": "...",
"prepared_now": [
"schema_drafts",
"title_drafts",
"rico_briefings",
"rollback_plans"
],
"deferred_until_unlock": [
"title_rewrites",
"internal_link_additions",
"cms_slot_patches",
"category_deactivations"
],
"unlock_criteria_status": {
"time": "not_met|met",
"data": "not_met|partial|met",
"stability": "not_met|partial|met",
"decision": "not_met|met"
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 271 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 34fb55f3b094
recovery-full is a command published in the GitHub repository maxschottke-spec/seo-survival-kit (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 3,133 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
linkerd
Linkerd-specific diagnostics — mTLS verification, proxy injection issues, authorization policy debugging, traffic management, and multi-cluster connectivity problems.
debug
Systematic debugging with hypotheses and evidence gathering.
ia-report-bug
Report a bug in the whetstone plugin.
data-flow-analysis
Trace how data flows through the system from input to output.
duck-off
Turn off Rubber Duck mode and answer normally.
bug
Reproduce then TDD-fix a ready-for-agent bug ticket in this checkout. Web bugs get a browser repro first.