Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/mcpwright/census-mcp/review-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mcpwright/census-mcpWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00308 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00154 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to review-pr — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Run a pre-PR code review of the current branch using the code-reviewer
subagent. The point is a review in a fresh context — so do not summarize the
diff yourself; let the subagent read the code.
Base ref: $1 (default main if empty).
- Sanity-check the range: run
git log <base>..HEAD --onelineandgit diff --stat <base>...HEADso you (and I) can see what's in scope. If the branch ismainor has no commits over the base, stop and say so. - Launch the
code-reviewersubagent (Task tool,subagent_type: code-reviewer). Tell it only the base ref and that it should rungit diff <base>...HEADand read the touched files itself. Do not paste the diff or describe the change — its value is the independent read. - Relay the subagent's report back verbatim under a
## Code reviewheading. - Do not fix anything yet. Wait for me to decide which findings to address; then I'll have you fold them in before the PR.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 22 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A ce71cfc3cf0a
review-pr is a command published in the GitHub repository mcpwright/census-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 308 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to review-pr, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.