Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mcpwright/edgar-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mcpwright/edgar-mcp/main/.claude/commands/review-pr.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mcpwright/edgar-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mcpwright/edgar-mcp/review-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mcpwright/edgar-mcp/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mcpwright/edgar-mcp/review-pr.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00308 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00154 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run a pre-PR code review of the current branch using the code-reviewer
subagent. The point is a review in a fresh context — so do not summarize the
diff yourself; let the subagent read the code.
Base ref: $1 (default main if empty).
- Sanity-check the range: run
git log <base>..HEAD --onelineandgit diff --stat <base>...HEADso you (and I) can see what's in scope. If the branch ismainor has no commits over the base, stop and say so. - Launch the
code-reviewersubagent (Task tool,subagent_type: code-reviewer). Tell it only the base ref and that it should rungit diff <base>...HEADand read the touched files itself. Do not paste the diff or describe the change — its value is the independent read. - Relay the subagent's report back verbatim under a
## Code reviewheading. - Do not fix anything yet. Wait for me to decide which findings to address; then I'll have you fold them in before the PR.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 22 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A ce71cfc3cf0a
review-pr is a command published in the GitHub repository mcpwright/edgar-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 308 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
review-sdk-app
Review and validate a Claude Agent SDK application against best practices.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
ui-flow-review
Review menus, HUD, navigation, and player flow from a UX perspective.