codeledger

A command that asks CodeLedger, the project's local record of its engineering state, about the codebase or a request.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for running checks, viewing indexed code areas and entry points, diagnosing the project, checking whether working behavior was removed, and recording finished tasks.
Why use it?
It provides a defined way to check whether the project's information is current, understand its layout, diagnose issues, and record completed work.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/mikuare/code-ledger/codeledger
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mikuare/Code-Ledger

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 18 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 661 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00018 $0.00661
Opus 5 $0.00009 $0.00331
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00132
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00066

Measured yesterday against content hash 21b6cb701156, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

codeledger scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/codeledger.md · 27 lines

What it actually says

CodeLedger is this project's local engineering memory. Route on $ARGUMENTS:

  • empty, or check — run codeledger check. Report the verdict line, then any component that is not OK, then the recommended commands verbatim. STALE means the index is behind the working tree and every other answer describes an earlier state; say so plainly rather than reporting it as a minor detail.
  • check --deep — run codeledger check --deep. Same, and it also launches the MCP server and completes a real handshake.
  • map, or map <area> — run codeledger map (adding the area if one was given). Summarise the areas, the entry points and the most-depended-on symbols. This is what the project looks like from the index; you did not need to open a file for it.
  • doctor — run codeledger doctor and report what it found.
  • guard — run codeledger guard. Report whether anything that was working is gone, with each finding's options; never pick an option yourself.
  • value — run codeledger value and summarise what CodeLedger has recorded doing here.
  • done <task> — run codeledger done "<task>" --agent claude-code. Report the verdict and, below DONE, exactly what remains; do not soften it.
  • anything else — treat $ARGUMENTS as the task and run codeledger brief "$ARGUMENTS". Do not rewrite the task first; pass it exactly as given.

For brief, act on do_next:

  • ASK_USERstop and ask the user the questions it returned, with their options. Do not pick one yourself, and do not start work on the most plausible reading. The whole point of the question is that the repository cannot answer it.
  • CONFIRM — restate the task in your own words (what changes, what does not, how it is verified) and run codeledger brief "$ARGUMENTS" --understanding "<your restatement>". Report CONFIRMED or MISMATCH before editing.
  • RESUME — report next_action and failed_attempts first. Do not repeat an approach already recorded as failed.
  • RECONSIDER — say what the previous attempts actually changed, and why repeating them is unlikely to help.
  • PROCEED_WITH_CARE / PROCEED — report the target, the files in scope and the measured footprint, then continue with the task.

Report what CodeLedger said. Where it says UNKNOWN, say UNKNOWN — it means the evidence is absent, never that there is nothing to worry about.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 27 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 21b6cb701156

Subscribe to this mod's changes

codeledger is a command published in the GitHub repository mikuare/Code-Ledger (0 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 661 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.