MockServer is a testing server and proxy that imitates APIs, records and changes network traffic, and deliberately introduces failures. It is for developers testing applications against unavailable dependencies, debugging requests, and checking how systems handle degraded services across several network protocols. The catalogue add-ons help operate, configure, and test MockServer.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mock-server/mockserver-monorepo. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mock-server/mockserver-monorepo/master/.claude/commands/pr-review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mock-server/mockserver-monorepoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mock-server/mockserver-monorepo/pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mock-server/mockserver-monorepo/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mock-server/mockserver-monorepo/pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mock-server/mockserver-monorepo/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mock-server/mockserver-monorepo/pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00044 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00018 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00009 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00004 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Read .opencode/skills/pr-review/SKILL.md and follow its workflow for the following request:
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 7 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 466cb2176a0c
pr-review is a command published in the GitHub repository mock-server/mockserver-monorepo (4,999 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 44 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
bmad-checkpoint-preview
LLM-assisted human-in-the-loop review. Make sense of a change, focus attention where it matters, test. Use when the user says "checkpoint", "human review", or "walk me through this change".
bmad-code-review
Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers (Blind Hunter, Edge Case Hunter, Acceptance Auditor) with structured triage into actionable categories. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code".
bmad-review-edge-case-hunter
Walk every branching path and boundary condition in content, report only unhandled edge cases. Orthogonal to adversarial review - method-driven not attitude-driven. Use when you need exhaustive edge-case analysis of code, specs, or diffs.
bmad-review-adversarial-general
Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
refactor
Systematic code refactoring with smart scope detection.