Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mmornati/leanproxy-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mmornati/leanproxy-mcp/bmad-review-adversarial-general)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mmornati/leanproxy-mcp/bmad-review-adversarial-general"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mmornati/leanproxy-mcp/bmad-review-adversarial-general/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mmornati/leanproxy-mcp/bmad-review-adversarial-general"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mmornati/leanproxy-mcp/bmad-review-adversarial-general.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00036 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00018 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00007 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00004 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-review-adversarial-general scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
@skills/bmad-review-adversarial-general
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 6 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 51bd1d87d43b
bmad-review-adversarial-general is a command published in the GitHub repository mmornati/leanproxy-mcp (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 36 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
go-build
Fix Go build and vet errors.
pr-ready
Run the project's pre-commit review loop to determine whether the current branch is ready to push — lint, tests, parallel pr-review-toolkit agents plus an over-engineering audit, fix-and-re-run until convergence.
fix-issue
Analyze and fix a GitHub issue.
harness-review
Review the current change set from an opposing harness-engineering perspective.
code-quality
Code review and bug prediction — find quality issues, style violations, and likely bugs.
review-hard
Review the current task changes for real correctness, safety, and maintainability risks before slice closure or PR prep, and recommend the smallest safe next step. Surfaces meaningful issues (not cosmetic feedback); not a replacement for external review systems. Returns no-op when the review would not materially…