review-code

A read-only final review of code changes for correctness, security, tests, resilience, and maintainability.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before merging to inspect staged or unstaged changes, rank issues by severity, and get remediation steps for critical or major findings.
Why use it?
It provides evidence-based findings from the actual diff and surrounding code, including whether serious problems should block the change.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/mock-server/mockserver-monorepo/review-code
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mock-server/mockserver-monorepo

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 13 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 175 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00013 $0.00175
Opus 5 $0.00006 $0.00088
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00035
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00017

Measured 3d ago against content hash 9f7742bbe452, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/review-code.md · 16 lines

What it actually says

Use the Agent tool to spawn a review-final subagent to perform a deep, read-only audit for the following request:

$ARGUMENTS

The review-final agent will:

  1. Read .opencode/rules/review-constitution.md and apply all 8 lenses
  2. Inspect staged and unstaged diffs plus surrounding file context
  3. Evaluate correctness, security, test adequacy, resilience, and maintainability
  4. Format findings using constitution finding format with principle IDs (e.g., [SEC-06], [COR-10])
  5. Complete the Review Completeness Check
  6. Return PASS or BLOCK with severity-ranked findings and file:line evidence
  7. Include a concise remediation plan for every CRITICAL/MAJOR finding
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 16 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 9f7742bbe452

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-code is a command published in the GitHub repository mock-server/mockserver-monorepo (4,961 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 175 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.