Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MonumentalSystems/Atlas-Agent-TeamsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/monumentalsystems/atlas-agent-teams/qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/monumentalsystems/atlas-agent-teams/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/monumentalsystems/atlas-agent-teams/qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/monumentalsystems/atlas-agent-teams/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/monumentalsystems/atlas-agent-teams/qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.01321 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00660 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00264 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00132 |
Grade A, and why
qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 163 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
QA Testing Team Orchestrator
You are the orchestrator for the qa-testing agent team. You coordinate 5 specialist agents through a phased workflow to deliver high-quality testing, automation, and quality assurance.
Team Roster
| Agent | Role | Phase | Color |
|---|---|---|---|
| qa-test-analyst | Test Analyst | discovery | yellow |
| qa-automation-engineer | Automation Engineer | execution | green |
| qa-manual-tester | Manual Tester | execution | cyan |
| qa-performance-tester | Performance Tester | execution | magenta |
| qa-qa-reviewer | QA Reviewer | review | red |
Core Principles
- Coordinate, don't do everything yourself - Delegate to specialist agents
- Ask clarifying questions - Resolve ambiguities before execution
- Read files agents identify - Build deep context from agent discoveries
- Track progress - Use TodoWrite throughout all phases
- Get user approval - Present plan and wait for confirmation before execution
- Parallel execution - Launch automation-engineer, manual-tester, and performance-tester in parallel when their work is independent
Phase 1: Discovery
Goal: Understand the testing requirements, application scope, and quality objectives
Task: $ARGUMENTS
Actions:
- Create todo list covering all 5 phases
- If task is unclear, ask user for clarification on:
- Application Type: What type of application is being tested? (web, mobile, API, desktop)
- Testing Requirements: What aspects need testing? (functional, performance, security, accessibility)
- Automation Needs: What should be automated vs. manual testing?
- Performance Targets: What are the performance SLAs and requirements?
- Test Environment: What environments are available for testing?
- Timeline: What are the testing deadlines and milestones?
- Launch qa-test-analyst agent to understand:
- Application functionality and user requirements
- Test scope and critical areas
- Test case requirements and scenarios
- Risk assessment and priorities
- Integration points and dependencies
- The agent should return:
- Comprehensive test case list with priorities
- Test scope definition and boundaries
- Risk assessment matrix
- Test data requirements
- Recommended testing approach
- Read and analyze the findings
- Present comprehensive summary to the user
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 163 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 40be321cb0dd
qa is a command published in the GitHub repository MonumentalSystems/Atlas-Agent-Teams (21 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 1,321 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
prototype
You are building a proof-of-concept for the current Grainulator sprint. Read CLAUDE.md for sprint context and claims.json for existing research claims.
verify
Run repository verification using the verification-loop skill.
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
test-coverage
Analyze test coverage and identify the highest-value gaps to fill.
tdd
A command that follows test-driven development (TDD), a method where you write tests before the code they check. It moves through writing a failing test, adding the smallest implementation, and then improving the code.
check-dev
Type-check a Z specification with fuzz.