Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrgnfndr-dr/mind-cloneWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mrgnfndr-dr/mind-clone/mind-clone-ask)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mrgnfndr-dr/mind-clone/mind-clone-ask"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mrgnfndr-dr/mind-clone/mind-clone-ask/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mrgnfndr-dr/mind-clone/mind-clone-ask"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mrgnfndr-dr/mind-clone/mind-clone-ask.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00290 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00116 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00058 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
mind-clone-ask scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Invoke the mind-clone skill in CHAT mode for this request.
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
- Resolve which clone is meant: match
$ARGUMENTSagainst the folders in./clones/. If the author is named, use that clone; if only a question is given and exactly one clone exists, use it; if ambiguous or none exists, list./clones/and ask (do NOT start a build from this command). - Then follow
reference/04-clone-runtime.md: answer only through the contour (loop.py:intent → sources → map → select → compile → verify). Route by question type — how-to/method fromrender playbook(concrete steps), advice grounded in the delivered EPs, or a confidence-rated prediction (clearly labeled as extrapolation). Grounded answers quote the author with deep-links to the exact minute. - Follow the language protocol: reply in the user's chat language (from
config.json); keep the canon (theeptable) in English. - This command never builds or modifies a clone — it only reads. To build, use
/mind-clone-build.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 14 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 27347b781f28
mind-clone-ask is a command published in the GitHub repository mrgnfndr-dr/mind-clone (4 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 290 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
valuation-methods
Valuation methods analysis — multiples, DCF inputs, PEG integration, valuation assumption extraction.
genshijin-compress
A command for safely shortening Markdown or text files into the genshijin style.
design-form
Design a form with the fewest fields that works, clear labels, and errors that help.
review
Submit a story for verification (In Progress → In Review, no PR yet).
standup
Alias of /board — the async sprint snapshot.
enum-udp
UDP scan + service follow-up — top ports first, full sweep only when justified.