Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrvladd-d/memobankWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mrvladd-d/memobank/execute)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mrvladd-d/memobank/execute"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mrvladd-d/memobank/execute/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mrvladd-d/memobank/execute"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mrvladd-d/memobank/execute.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.02038 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00815 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00408 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00204 |
Grade A, and why
execute scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 182 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/execute - Execute One TASK
Status Transition Modes
Status transitions have two modes.
Scheduler mode:
/autopilotand/autonomousown task status transitions.- Scheduler decides closure/failure/blocking eligibility.
/executereturns scoped implementation handoff; it does not close tasks./verifygives functional verdict/evidence; in scheduler mode it does not close/fail/block/promote./red-verifygives semantic verdict for T2/T3; in scheduler mode it does not close/fail/block/promote.- Scheduler must write the closure/failure/blocking decision, final task status, and evidence links to the authoritative indexed
.memory-bank/tasks/TASK-*.task.jsonrecord before/mb-sync. /mb-syncrecords/reconciles already-written task state. It does not decide closure/failure/blocking/promotion and must not sync a decision that exists only in scheduler context.- T0/T1 scheduler closure may use compact evidence / functional PASS according to tier policy.
- T2/T3 scheduler closure requires
VERDICT: PASSplusSEMANTIC_VERDICT: semantic-passbefore scheduler marksdone. - T3 scheduler closure also requires exact markers
HUMAN_CHECKPOINT: doneandROLLBACK_RECOVERY_NOTE: present.
Manual mode:
- Expected T0/T1 simple flow:
/execute -> /verifyfor one TASK. - Manual closure is allowed only when an explicit closure owner exists.
explicit standalone ownermeans either the user directly asked the current top-level agent to close the task, or the top-level agent/orchestrator explicitly runs a manual workflow for one TASK and records that it owns closure. Subagents/worker prompts do not silently become closure owners./verify PASSmay markT0/T1status: doneonly when explicit closure ownership is present and completed evidence has been written to the task recordverifyfield and the compact/full protocol required by tier.- If explicit closure owner is absent,
/verifyrecordsVERDICT: PASS, evidence, and a closure recommendation, leavesstatusunchanged, and tells the scheduler/owner to close. T2/T3manual closure requires/verify PASSplus/red-verifySEMANTIC_VERDICT: semantic-passbeforestatus: doneor/mb-sync; if semantic-pass is absent, leave closure pending or blocked, not done.semantic-concernin manual mode means do not trust the existingdonestate without human review / follow-up.- Do not mix scheduler mode and manual mode inside one task run.
- No persisted
modefield is used.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 182 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5f3a02ec3418
execute is a command published in the GitHub repository mrvladd-d/memobank (56 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 2,038 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
template
Manage issue templates for streamlined issue creation.
fest-show
Show festival progression (in-progress tasks, roadmap, and dependency view).
add-note
Add an internal or external note to a ConnectWise PSA ticket.
dispatcher
Use when you want the orchestrator to pick the next repo to work on across your whole portfolio — it enumerates candidate repos below the confinement root, resolves free/busy from each repo's session.lock lease, ranks the FREE ones by backlog priority × staleness × readiness, recommends the single most worthwhile one…
sync-linear
Sync current work with Linear ticket status.
workpm
A project-management workflow for coordinating multiple AI workers through five stages. It includes task assignment, shared activity logs, worker replacement, and final checks.