Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MSApps-Mobile/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/msapps-mobile/claude-plugins/backup-setup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/msapps-mobile/claude-plugins/backup-setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/msapps-mobile/claude-plugins/backup-setup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/msapps-mobile/claude-plugins/backup-setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/msapps-mobile/claude-plugins/backup-setup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00174 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00070 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00035 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
backup-setup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Guide the user through setting up the backup:
- Check if config exists: Read
~/.cowork-gdrive-config.json - If not configured: Walk the user through:
- Deploying the Google Apps Script web app
- Getting the script URL and API key
- Creating the config file:
{ "url": "https://script.google.com/macros/s/YOUR_SCRIPT_ID/exec", "apiKey": "<REDACTED — stored in ~/.cowork-gdrive-config.json>" }
- Test the connection: Upload a small test file to verify it works
- Set up scheduling: Create a Cowork scheduled task for daily runs
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 21 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A c72f348233f3
backup-setup is a command published in the GitHub repository MSApps-Mobile/claude-plugins (9 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 174 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-13.
Other commands, from other repositories
list-alerts
List active RMM alerts from Atera.
cost-report
Cloud cost anomaly and reclaimable-spend report for a given window.
backup-health-check
Check backup health for one Axcient-protected device.
client-backup-overview
Backup health overview across every device for one Axcient client.
eu-cloud-sovereignty
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an EU Cloud Sovereignty Framework Assessment for an organisation procuring, specifying, or evaluating cloud services against the European Commission's EU Cloud Sovereignty Framework (v1.2.1, October 2025). The framework supplements security assurance (SecNumCloud, EUCS…
nl-cloud
You are helping an enterprise architect generate a Rijksbreed Cloudbeleid Compliance Assessment for Dutch central government (Rijksoverheid) cloud use. The Herziening rijksbreed cloudbeleid 2026 (Ministerie van Economische Zaken en Klimaat, 3 July 2026, definitief) is the governing policy — it applies to all central…