Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WYRE-AI/msp-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/wyre-ai/msp-claude-plugins/backup-health-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wyre-ai/msp-claude-plugins/backup-health-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wyre-ai/msp-claude-plugins/backup-health-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wyre-ai/msp-claude-plugins/backup-health-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wyre-ai/msp-claude-plugins/backup-health-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00733 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00293 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
backup-health-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Backup Health Check
Full health check for one Axcient x360Recover device: current status, recovery-point freshness across all storage tiers, AutoVerify boot-test result, and recent job run history.
Prerequisites
- Axcient MCP server connected with a valid API key
- MCP tools
axcient_get_device,axcient_get_device_autoverify, andaxcient_get_job_historyavailable - The device's
device_id(fromaxcient_list_devicesoraxcient_list_devices_by_clientif not already known)
Steps
-
Pull device detail
Call
axcient_get_devicewithdevice_id. Extractcurrent_health_status,previous_health_status,type,product,d2c, and all threelatest_local_rp/latest_vault_rp/latest_cloud_rptimestamps. Note the device'sclient_idandjobsarray from the response — you'll need both for the next steps. -
Check AutoVerify
Call
axcient_get_device_autoverifywithdevice_id. This is the strongest recoverability signal available — a job can report success while producing an image that doesn't actually boot. Noteis_healthyand the timestamp of the last verification. -
Check recent job history
For each job ID in the device's
jobsarray, callaxcient_get_job_historywith the device'sclient_id,device_id, and thejob_id, using astarttime_begina few days back. Look for a pattern of failures rather than a single missed run. -
Synthesize
Report:
- Overall status (healthy / degraded / stale / unknown)
- Which of the three recovery-point tiers (local/vault/cloud) are current vs. stale, with actual timestamps
- Whether AutoVerify confirms the latest recovery point boots
- Any job showing a recent failure pattern, with the job name/ID
Do not report "backed up" as a single yes/no — state each tier's freshness explicitly, since a device can be current locally while its cloud or vault replication has silently stalled.
Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| device_id | integer | Yes | The Axcient device to check |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 85 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A badeb4576861
backup-health-check is a command published in the GitHub repository WYRE-AI/msp-claude-plugins (52 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 733 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
backup-health-check compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| backup-health-checkWYRE-AI/msp-claude-plugins | Command | 52 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| ship-deploymentcomposio-community/awesome-claude-plugins | Command | 2.0k | 5d ago | none | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| backup-setupMSApps-Mobile/claude-plugins | Command | 11 | today | MIT | A | 10 | Claude Code |
| backup-statusMSApps-Mobile/claude-plugins | Command | 11 | today | MIT | A | 10 | Claude Code |
| backup-nowMSApps-Mobile/claude-plugins | Command | 11 | today | MIT | A | 15 | Claude Code |
| lb-createTheLobbi/Claude-m | Command | 19 | 1mo ago | none | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| setupzircote/terraform-lsp | Command | 2 | 7d ago | MIT | D | 0 | Claude Code |