Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add mumerfarooq-con/asdlc-tools/plugin install asdlcWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mumerfarooq-con/asdlc-tools/jira-run)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mumerfarooq-con/asdlc-tools/jira-run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mumerfarooq-con/asdlc-tools/jira-run/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mumerfarooq-con/asdlc-tools/jira-run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mumerfarooq-con/asdlc-tools/jira-run.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.02333 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00933 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00467 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00233 |
Grade A, and why
jira-run scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 107 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/asdlc:jira-run
One run does two phases: first it EXECUTES plans I've already approved, then it PLANS new tickets
and leaves them for me to approve. Approval is never something you do — it only ever comes from me
setting status: approved in a plan file.
Scripts live in ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/jira/scripts/. Always call them by that full path, as written
below; run them from the repo root. They read the project's .asdlc/jira.conf and the token env vars.
0. Config, lock, args
- Read the config:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/jira/scripts/jira-conf.sh. If it fails (no config), tell me to run/asdlc:jira-setupand STOP. NoteTARGET_BRANCH— every<TARGET_BRANCH>below is that value. - Take the run lock:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/jira/scripts/run-state.sh lock. It prints a run id: keep it as<RUN_ID>.- Exit 10 means another run holds the lock. Show me the holder it names (who, since when) and
STOP. If I tell you that run crashed, I clear it myself, or I tell you to run
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/jira/scripts/run-state.sh force-unlock— never run that on your own. - Always release the lock before you finish, including on error:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/jira/scripts/run-state.sh unlock <RUN_ID>.
- Exit 10 means another run holds the lock. Show me the holder it names (who, since when) and
STOP. If I tell you that run crashed, I clear it myself, or I tell you to run
- Read the phase flags from the arguments:
--plan-only(Phase B only),--execute-only(Phase A only),--reset-executing(before Phase A, run${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/jira/scripts/run-state.sh reset-executing: every plan a crashed run leftexecutinggoes back toapproved, if its approved part is unchanged — what the run logged under the plan's Progress section doesn't count. Relay what it prints; a plan it refuses needs a re-stamp and my re-approval). Everything else is a selection to hand to jira-mine in Phase B.
Phase A — execute approved plans (skip if --plan-only)
List plan files: ls ./plans/*.plan.md. For each, run
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/plan-state.sh check <plan> and act on the word it prints:
RUNNABLE→ implement it (steps below).STALE→ skip; report ": plan changed since approval — re-approve".EXECUTINGPENDINGDONEFAILEDSKIPMISSING→ skip (mention EXECUTING/FAILED, stay quiet on the rest).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +14 lines 9c8ff7e49e98
- 9d ago First seen · 93 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 8e1d55055e3c
jira-run is a command published in the GitHub repository mumerfarooq-con/asdlc-tools (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 2,333 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-09.
Other commands, from other repositories
poc
Before building on an unproven idea, get a timeboxed yes/no answer — start a hypothesis-driven POC that skips 80% of the production pipeline and forces ship/pivot/kill at expiry, then promote a shipped POC through the audits it skipped.
spec
Know the problem but not yet the product, the requirements or the design? Run it — you get, stage by stage, a discovery plan (/spec discover), a PRD (/spec prd) and a build spec: requirements.md + design.md + tasks.md (/spec or /spec build). Run before writing any code.
ownership
When you need to know who owns a path and who answers for it — the service ownership matrix (team, lead, on-call, SLA) auto-detected from git with CODEOWNERS generated, plus on-call rotations, shift handoffs and escalation paths.
rfc
RFC process for cross-team decisions. Create, track, and close RFCs. Accepted RFCs auto-create ADRs.
exception
Signed gate-exception registry — replace ad-hoc --admin / --no-verify bypasses with an auditable, signed, expiring record (who · why · gate · scope · expiry). Create / list / check exceptions.
auto-task
Create an agent team for autonomous workflow: plan (Architect teammate + PM teammate) → develop (Developer teammate + Code-tester teammate + QA-tester teammate + Reviewer teammate) → report (no approval gate).