Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MuratKus/qaradarWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/muratkus/qaradar/qa-risky)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/muratkus/qaradar/qa-risky"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/muratkus/qaradar/qa-risky.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00107 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00053 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00021 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
qa-risky scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Call qaradar_risky_modules on $ARGUMENTS (default: current repo).
Group results by risk level (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW). For each HIGH-risk file, explain the top 1–2 reasons it scored high and recommend whether to add tests, increase coverage, or refactor. Keep it tight.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 10 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 68315fe86a72
qa-risky is a command published in the GitHub repository MuratKus/qaradar (0 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 107 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
verify
Run repository verification using the verification-loop skill.
test-coverage
Analyze test coverage and identify the highest-value gaps to fill.
tdd
A command that follows test-driven development (TDD), a method where you write tests before the code they check. It moves through writing a failing test, adding the smallest implementation, and then improving the code.
check-dev
Type-check a Z specification with fuzz.
laravel-playwright
E2E Playwright patterns; use the laravel:e2e-playwright skill exactly as written.