Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/test-coveragegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sifxprime/kodelyth-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/test-coverage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/test-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/test-coverage.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00631 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00316 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
test-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- ccc-test-coverage — 97% identical, 4 lines differ
- test-coverage — 94% identical, 6 lines differ
- test-coverage — 94% identical, 6 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Coverage
Analyze test coverage, identify gaps, and generate missing tests to reach 80%+ coverage.
Step 1: Detect Test Framework
| Indicator | Coverage Command |
|---|---|
jest.config.* or package.json jest |
npx jest --coverage --coverageReporters=json-summary |
vitest.config.* |
npx vitest run --coverage |
pytest.ini / pyproject.toml pytest |
pytest --cov=src --cov-report=json |
Cargo.toml |
cargo llvm-cov --json |
pom.xml with JaCoCo |
mvn test jacoco:report |
go.mod |
go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./... |
Step 2: Analyze Coverage Report
- Run the coverage command
- Parse the output (JSON summary or terminal output)
- List files below 80% coverage, sorted worst-first
- For each under-covered file, identify:
- Untested functions or methods
- Missing branch coverage (if/else, switch, error paths)
- Dead code that inflates the denominator
Step 3: Generate Missing Tests
For each under-covered file, generate tests following this priority:
- Happy path — Core functionality with valid inputs
- Error handling — Invalid inputs, missing data, network failures
- Edge cases — Empty arrays, null/undefined, boundary values (0, -1, MAX_INT)
- Branch coverage — Each if/else, switch case, ternary
Test Generation Rules
- Place tests adjacent to source:
foo.ts→foo.test.ts(or project convention) - Use existing test patterns from the project (import style, assertion library, mocking approach)
- Mock external dependencies (database, APIs, file system)
- Each test should be independent — no shared mutable state between tests
- Name tests descriptively:
test_create_user_with_duplicate_email_returns_409
Step 4: Verify
- Run the full test suite — all tests must pass
- Re-run coverage — verify improvement
- If still below 80%, repeat Step 3 for remaining gaps
Step 5: Report
Show before/after comparison:
Coverage Report
──────────────────────────────
File Before After
src/services/auth.ts 45% 88%
src/utils/validation.ts 32% 82%
──────────────────────────────
Overall: 67% 84% PASS:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 74 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A dc7c4ff1532d
test-coverage is a command published in the GitHub repository sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc (11 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 631 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
toh-help
Display all Toh Framework commands and quick usage guide.
research
Delegate a thorough research investigation to the agy:runner subagent.
experiment
Design A/B test with statistical rigor. Usage: /mindforge:experiment [feature] [--metric conversion|engagement|revenue] [--duration 2w].
kimi-setup
Run node "$HOME/.kimi-plugin/kimi-companion.mjs" setup, then report installation and authentication status.
Obad
Search for given words or phrases in the book of Obadiah in one or multiple bibles.
strategy-cfo
商业战略与财商融合决策专家 — 商业模式 / 资本结构 / 投资决策 / 资源配置 / 估值视角.