Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/rohitbind123/claude-setup/test-coveragegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RohitBind123/claude-setupWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00615 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00308 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
test-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to test-coverage — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 70 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Coverage
Analyze test coverage, identify gaps, and generate missing tests to reach 80%+ coverage.
Step 1: Detect Test Framework
| Indicator | Coverage Command |
|---|---|
jest.config.* or package.json jest |
npx jest --coverage --coverageReporters=json-summary |
vitest.config.* |
npx vitest run --coverage |
pytest.ini / pyproject.toml pytest |
pytest --cov=src --cov-report=json |
Cargo.toml |
cargo llvm-cov --json |
pom.xml with JaCoCo |
mvn test jacoco:report |
go.mod |
go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./... |
Step 2: Analyze Coverage Report
- Run the coverage command
- Parse the output (JSON summary or terminal output)
- List files below 80% coverage, sorted worst-first
- For each under-covered file, identify:
- Untested functions or methods
- Missing branch coverage (if/else, switch, error paths)
- Dead code that inflates the denominator
Step 3: Generate Missing Tests
For each under-covered file, generate tests following this priority:
- Happy path — Core functionality with valid inputs
- Error handling — Invalid inputs, missing data, network failures
- Edge cases — Empty arrays, null/undefined, boundary values (0, -1, MAX_INT)
- Branch coverage — Each if/else, switch case, ternary
Test Generation Rules
- Place tests adjacent to source:
foo.ts→foo.test.ts(or project convention) - Use existing test patterns from the project (import style, assertion library, mocking approach)
- Mock external dependencies (database, APIs, file system)
- Each test should be independent — no shared mutable state between tests
- Name tests descriptively:
test_create_user_with_duplicate_email_returns_409
Step 4: Verify
- Run the full test suite — all tests must pass
- Re-run coverage — verify improvement
- If still below 80%, repeat Step 3 for remaining gaps
Step 5: Report
Show before/after comparison:
Coverage Report
──────────────────────────────
File Before After
src/services/auth.ts 45% 88%
src/utils/validation.ts 32% 82%
──────────────────────────────
Overall: 67% 84% ✅
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 70 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3b6899e41753
test-coverage is a command published in the GitHub repository RohitBind123/claude-setup (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 615 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to test-coverage, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.