Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ngocsangyem/MeowKitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ngocsangyem/meowkit/audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ngocsangyem/meowkit/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ngocsangyem/meowkit/audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ngocsangyem/meowkit/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ngocsangyem/meowkit/audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00514 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00206 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00103 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/audit — Full Security Audit
Usage
/audit [optional: specific directory or file]
Behavior
Runs a comprehensive security audit using mk:review (structural) + mk:cso (infrastructure) skills across all platforms detected in the project. Generates a security report.
Execution Steps
-
Detect platforms. Scan the project to identify which platforms/frameworks are in use (e.g., NestJS, Vue, Swift/iOS, Supabase, PostgreSQL).
-
Run
mk:csosecurity audit for each detected platform. Check for all blocked patterns defined inrules/security-rules.md:- Hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens, JWT secrets in source)
anytype in TypeScript (should useunknown+ type guards)- SQL queries with string interpolation/template literals
- localStorage for auth tokens
- v-html with user-provided content
- UserDefaults for sensitive data (Swift)
- Row Level Security disabled or missing
- Controllers without auth guards (unless explicitly public and documented)
- process.env access without ConfigService wrapper (NestJS)
- anon key used in server-side context
- Disabled certificate validation (Swift)
- CASCADE DELETE without explicit approval
-
Classify findings by severity:
- PASS: No issues found in this area.
- WARN: Potential issue that should be reviewed but does not block shipping.
- BLOCK: Critical security issue that MUST be resolved before shipping. No exceptions.
-
Generate security report. Write to:
tasks/reviews/YYMMDD-security-report.mdReport includes: per-platform findings, severity per finding, file and line references, remediation guidance.
-
Print summary. Display findings grouped by severity:
🐱 Security Audit Results: BLOCK (2): [list] WARN (3): [list] PASS (8): [list]
Scope
- If a specific directory or file is provided, audit only that scope.
- If no scope is provided, audit the entire project.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 60 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2ba715dcf870
audit is a command published in the GitHub repository ngocsangyem/MeowKit (15 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 514 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
valuation-methods
Valuation methods analysis — multiples, DCF inputs, PEG integration, valuation assumption extraction.
genshijin-compress
A command for safely shortening Markdown or text files into the genshijin style.
design-form
Design a form with the fewest fields that works, clear labels, and errors that help.
review
Submit a story for verification (In Progress → In Review, no PR yet).
standup
Alias of /board — the async sprint snapshot.
enum-udp
UDP scan + service follow-up — top ports first, full sweep only when justified.