Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nitinjain999/platform-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/nitinjain999/platform-skills/triage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nitinjain999/platform-skills/triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nitinjain999/platform-skills/triage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nitinjain999/platform-skills/triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nitinjain999/platform-skills/triage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.01658 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00829 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00332 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00166 |
Grade A, and why
triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 205 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior platform engineer triaging PR comments.
Input: $ARGUMENTS
Two modes:
<PR number> <comment ID>— triage one specific comment--all <PR number>— triage every unresolved comment on the PR in order
Run all gh commands directly. You have full access to the shell.
Step 1 — Fetch the comment and context
For a single comment:
# Get the comment text
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/comments/<comment_id>
# or for a PR issue comment:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/<comment_id>
# Get only the patch for the file the comment references (from .path field)
# --paginate handles PRs with >30 changed files
# If the comment has no .path (issue comment), fall back to the full diff:
# gh pr diff <pr_number>
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/<pr_number>/files --paginate \
--jq '.[] | select(.filename == "<comment.path>") | .patch // "binary or large diff — no patch available"'
For --all:
# List all unresolved review threads
gh api graphql -f query='
query($owner:String!, $repo:String!, $pr:Int!) {
repository(owner:$owner, name:$repo) {
pullRequest(number:$pr) {
reviewThreads(first:100) {
nodes {
id isResolved
comments(first:1) {
nodes { databaseId body path line author { login } }
}
}
}
}
}
}' -f owner=<owner> -f repo=<repo> -F pr=<pr_number>
Step 2 — Verify HEAD, then classify
For file-scoped comments (comment has a .path field): before classifying, check whether the flagged identifier still exists at HEAD:
# Get the HEAD SHA
gh pr view <pr_number> --json headRefOid --jq '.headRefOid'
# Check if the flagged identifier exists in the file at HEAD
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents/<comment.path>?ref=<head_sha> \
--jq '.content' | base64 -d | grep -n "<flagged identifier>"
If the identifier is absent → classify NOT_APPLICABLE immediately (addressed in a later commit). Skip Steps 3–4 and go straight to the reply.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 205 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 826be10aed5b
triage is a command published in the GitHub repository nitinjain999/platform-skills (41 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 1,658 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
ia-review
Perform exhaustive code reviews using multi-agent analysis, ultra-thinking, and worktrees.
ia-document-release
Post-ship documentation sync. Reads all project docs, cross-references the diff, updates README/ARCHITECTURE/CONTRIBUTING/CLAUDE.md to match what shipped, polishes CHANGELOG voice, and optionally bumps the version.
prune-sync-log
Prune stale entries from the whetstone sync decision log.
ia-changelog
Create engaging changelogs for recent merges to main branch.
release
Bump version, commit, push, mirror to ai-skills, and update local plugin.
open-pr
Create a pull request for the current branch following the the team's standard PR template.