Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nkhdiscovery/headless-agentic-codebaseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/nkhdiscovery/headless-agentic-codebase/brief-refresh)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nkhdiscovery/headless-agentic-codebase/brief-refresh"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nkhdiscovery/headless-agentic-codebase/brief-refresh/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nkhdiscovery/headless-agentic-codebase/brief-refresh"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nkhdiscovery/headless-agentic-codebase/brief-refresh.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00226 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00090 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00045 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
brief-refresh scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Audit the project docs and current state.
- Read every file in
docs/including ADRs. - Scan source code for actual current state.
- Write
docs/audits/$(date +%Y-%m-%d-%H%M).mdwith sections:
Contradictions — file:line, what doc says, what code shows.
Stale assumptions — claims that were true but aren't now.
Quietly resolved open decisions — items in product.md that have been decided in code but not written down.
Doc gaps — patterns that recur in code but aren't documented. Candidates for new ADRs.
Refactoring opportunities — worth >1hr saved future work.
New feature ideas — what would make the project meaningfully better.
For each finding:
- Clear-cut → file GitHub issue with
agent-proposed+priority:low. - Judgment-call → file with
needs-decision.
Commit audit file via branch + self-merge.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 28 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 4b0a1dc31420
brief-refresh is a command published in the GitHub repository nkhdiscovery/headless-agentic-codebase (10 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 226 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
github
(dev-only) github maintainer harness — GitHub issue-fix and PR-review via gh CLI. NOT distributed to user projects.
review
A command for reviewing code with security checks and a check for compliance with MX tags. The available description does not explain what MX tags are.
review
Command "review" from owainlewis/youtube-tutorials, covering review, target, instructions, simplicity and clarity.
conventions-check
Check AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, and the projected agent artifacts (skills, subagents, commands) against the repo's conventions.
review-pr-ci
Non-interactive PR review for CI/CD context. Read-only analysis — no edits.
audit
Comprehensive pre-commit audit - sanitization, frontmatter validity, vendor matrix consistency, broken links, TODO health.