Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/owainlewis/youtube-tutorialsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/owainlewis/youtube-tutorials/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/owainlewis/youtube-tutorials/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/owainlewis/youtube-tutorials/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/owainlewis/youtube-tutorials/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/owainlewis/youtube-tutorials/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00202 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00081 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00040 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review
Review code as a senior engineer would.
Target
$ARGUMENTS
If no target specified, review all changed files.
Instructions
Look at the code and ask:
Simplicity
- Is this over-engineered?
- Could it be shorter without losing clarity?
- Are there unnecessary abstractions?
Clarity
- Are names descriptive?
- Is the logic easy to follow?
- Would a new teammate understand this?
Consistency
- Does it match patterns in CLAUDE.md?
- Is it idiomatic for the language?
Correctness
- Are edge cases handled?
- Any obvious bugs?
Output
If changes needed:
- List specific issues with file and line
- Provide the fixed code
If code is good:
- Say so briefly and move on
Guidelines
- Be constructive, not nitpicky
- Focus on what matters: bugs, clarity, maintainability
- Don't suggest changes just to suggest changes
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 47 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 05222f442d3f
review is a command published in the GitHub repository owainlewis/youtube-tutorials (408 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 202 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-pr-ci
Non-interactive PR review for CI/CD context. Read-only analysis — no edits.
review-prs
Check open PRs for human feedback before picking new work.
brief-refresh
Audit docs for staleness and contradictions, propose new features.
audit-agents-skills
Audit quality of agents, skills, and commands in a Claude Code project.
review
A command for reviewing code with security checks and a check for compliance with MX tags. The available description does not explain what MX tags are.
release
Release manager for frontend and mobile. Writes App Store notes, user-facing changelog, flags stale docs and landing copy. Actions: notes | changelog | docs | sync.