Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nwiizo/ccswarmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/nwiizo/ccswarm/review-all)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nwiizo/ccswarm/review-all"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nwiizo/ccswarm/review-all.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00660 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00330 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00132 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
review-all scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Full Review
Runs all reviews at once on the ccswarm codebase.
Execution Content
The following reviews are executed:
- Design Compliance Check - Consistency with CLAUDE.md, docs/ARCHITECTURE.md
- Code Quality - Rust best practices compliance
- Duplicate Code Detection - Execute
/review-duplicatescommand (similarity-rs) - Architecture Patterns - Type-State, Channel-Based pattern compliance
Execution Method
Execute with Task tool using all-reviewer agent:
subagent_type: "Explore"
prompt: "Execute a full review on ccswarm.
1. CLAUDE.md design compliance check
2. docs/ARCHITECTURE.md architecture pattern compliance check
3. Rust best practices compliance check
4. /review-duplicates - Duplicate code detection
Summarize the results for each category in JSON format."
Architecture Pattern Check Items
Patterns based on CLAUDE.md:
| # | Pattern | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Type-State Pattern | Compile-time state verification, zero runtime cost |
| 2 | Channel-Based Orchestration | Prefer Channel over Arc |
| 3 | Iterator Pipelines | Zero-cost abstractions |
| 4 | Actor Model | Message passing over locks |
| 5 | Minimal Testing | Around 8-10 tests, focus on core functionality |
Rust Best Practices Check Items
| # | Item | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | unwrap() elimination | Forbidden in production code |
| 2 | Result<T, E> | Custom error types with thiserror |
| 3 | async/await | Use tokio runtime |
| 4 | Clippy clean | No warnings |
| 5 | Documentation | rustdoc for public APIs |
Output Format
{
"compliance": {
"claude_md": {"compliant": N, "partial": N, "non_compliant": N},
"architecture": {"compliant": N, "partial": N, "non_compliant": N}
},
"code_quality": {
"rust": {
"clippy_warnings": N,
"unsafe_count": N,
"unwrap_count": N
},
"similarity": {
"duplicate_patterns": N,
"refactoring_candidates": ["candidate1", "candidate2"]
}
},
"architecture_patterns": {
"type_state": "OK|NG",
"channel_based": "OK|NG",
"iterator_pipelines": "OK|NG",
"actor_model": "OK|NG",
"minimal_testing": "OK|NG",
"score": "N/5"
},
"summary": {
"overall_status": "OK|WARNING|CRITICAL",
"priority_actions": []
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 89 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 6c7e60827925
review-all is a command published in the GitHub repository nwiizo/ccswarm (151 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 660 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
argos
A command for checking whether an implementation matches its design deliverables. Its Korean description compares the work to the design as part of a completion inspection.