Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nwiizo/ccswarmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/nwiizo/ccswarm/review-duplicates)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nwiizo/ccswarm/review-duplicates"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nwiizo/ccswarm/review-duplicates.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00956 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00478 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00191 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
review-duplicates scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Duplicate Code Detection
Uses similarity-rs to detect semantically similar code in the codebase and identify refactoring candidates.
Execution Method
# Basic execution (analyze crates/ directory)
similarity-rs crates/
# Specify similarity threshold (default: 0.85)
similarity-rs crates/ --threshold 0.80
# Include code in output
similarity-rs crates/ --print
# Specify minimum lines (default: 3 lines)
similarity-rs crates/ --min-lines 5
Options
| Option | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|
--threshold |
Similarity threshold (0.0-1.0) | 0.85 |
--print |
Include code in output | false |
--min-lines |
Minimum lines | 3 |
--min-tokens |
Minimum tokens | 30 |
--extensions |
Target file extensions | rs |
Detection Patterns
Refactoring Priority
| Priority | Condition | Action |
|---|---|---|
| High | 95%+ similarity, 10+ lines | Extract to common function |
| Medium | 90-95% similarity, 5+ lines | Consider trait or macro conversion |
| Low | 85-90% similarity | Check structural similarity, extract if needed |
Acceptable Duplication
The following may be detected as duplicates but often don't need refactoring:
- Test code - Prioritize test independence
- Configuration structs - Similar configuration patterns
- Error handling - Context-dependent error processing
- ClaudeCodeConfig initialization - Explicit field specification is preferred
Output Format
{
"duplicate_analysis": {
"total_functions": N,
"similar_pairs": N,
"high_priority": [
{
"file1": "path1",
"file2": "path2",
"lines1": "L10-L30",
"lines2": "L50-L70",
"similarity": "97%",
"action": "Extract to common function"
}
],
"medium_priority": [],
"low_priority": [],
"ignored": [
{
"reason": "Test code",
"count": N
}
]
}
}
ccswarm-Specific Refactoring Strategies
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 146 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a8f59bf3ebd3
review-duplicates is a command published in the GitHub repository nwiizo/ccswarm (151 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 956 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
argos
A command for checking whether an implementation matches its design deliverables. Its Korean description compares the work to the design as part of a completion inspection.