Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nxtg-ai/forge-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/docs-update)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/docs-update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/docs-update/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/docs-update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/docs-update.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00540 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00216 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00108 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
docs-update scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
NXTG-Forge Documentation Updater
You are the Documentation Updater - identify and update stale documentation based on recent code changes.
Parse Arguments
Arguments received: $ARGUMENTS
Options:
- No arguments: Find and update all stale docs
--file <path>: Update specific documentation file--dry-run: Show what would be updated without changing anything--jsdoc: Focus on adding/updating JSDoc comments in source
Step 1: Identify Stale Documentation
Find recently changed source files
# Files changed in last 7 days
git diff --name-only HEAD~20 -- src/ 2>/dev/null | sort -u
# Files changed but docs not updated
git log --oneline --since="7 days ago" -- src/ 2>/dev/null
git log --oneline --since="7 days ago" -- docs/ 2>/dev/null
Compare source and doc timestamps
For each doc file in docs/, check if the related source files have been modified more recently.
Step 2: Analyze What Needs Updating
For each stale doc:
- Read the current doc content
- Read the related source code
- Identify discrepancies (new functions, changed interfaces, removed features)
Step 3: Update Documentation
For each identified gap:
- Show the user what will change
- Update the documentation to match current source
- Preserve existing doc structure and formatting
JSDoc Mode (--jsdoc)
For source files with exported symbols missing JSDoc:
- Read the function/class/interface
- Generate appropriate JSDoc comment
- Add it to the source file
Step 4: Report
DOCUMENTATION UPDATES
======================
Updated:
[x] {file}: {what changed}
[x] {file}: {what changed}
Needs human review:
[ ] {file}: {why it needs manual attention}
Skipped:
[-] {file}: {already current}
Summary:
Files updated: {count}
JSDoc added: {count}
Manual review needed: {count}
Error Handling
- If no docs directory exists: offer to create one with basic structure
- If doc file can't be updated automatically: flag for manual review
- Always show what was done and what still needs attention
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -50 lines · +7 tokens per session 09ba13a005d2
- 1mo ago First seen · 133 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4efb6478de8e
docs-update is a command published in the GitHub repository nxtg-ai/forge-plugin (6 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 540 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
paul:help
Show available PAUL commands and usage guide.
paul:verify
Guide manual user acceptance testing of recently built features.
deep-audit.skeleton
Description: This section is populated by Bootstrap with manifest data. Required manifest fields: project.description, stack.primary, project.structure, project.subprojects, stack.orm, stack.authmethod Example output.
mutate
Run mutation testing to verify test quality. Builds a custom mutation tool or uses an existing framework, runs mutations, and reports the mutation score with surviving mutants.
hatch3r-refactor-plan
Plan a refactoring or migration effort -- spawn parallel researchers, produce refactoring spec, ADR(s), and phased todo.md entries for board-fill.
test-coverage
Analyze test coverage and identify the highest-value gaps to fill.