Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ogrodev/fsocietyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ogrodev/fsociety/wpscan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ogrodev/fsociety/wpscan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ogrodev/fsociety/wpscan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ogrodev/fsociety/wpscan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ogrodev/fsociety/wpscan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00526 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00210 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
wpscan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Storage Policy: ALL output files MUST be saved in the project directory. NEVER write to
/tmp/or any system temporary directory.
WordPress Security Scan
Target: $ARGUMENTS
Execute WordPress-specific scanning using Hexstrike MCP tools.
Step 1: Load Tools
Use ToolSearch to load:
wpscan_analyze— comprehensive WordPress vulnerability scanningnuclei_scan— template-based scanning with WP-specific templateskatana_crawl— crawl for custom theme/plugin endpoints
Step 2: WPScan Enumeration
Run wpscan_analyze against the target to:
- Detect WordPress version
- Enumerate plugins (aggressive mode if stealth is not required)
- Enumerate themes
- Enumerate users (author ID brute force)
- Check for known vulnerabilities in detected components
- Identify interesting files (readme.html, license.txt, wp-config.php.bak)
Step 3: Nuclei WP Templates
Run nuclei_scan with WordPress-specific template tags:
wordpress,wp-plugin,wp-theme- Severity: critical, high, medium
- This catches vulnerabilities that WPScan's database might miss
Step 4: Custom Endpoint Discovery
Run katana_crawl to discover:
- Custom PHP endpoints in theme directories (
/wp-content/themes/*/) - Custom plugin endpoints
- AJAX handlers (
/wp-admin/admin-ajax.phpactions) - REST API custom routes (
/wp-json/) - Hidden admin tools or utilities
Step 5: Manual Checks
Verify these common WordPress attack vectors:
- XML-RPC enabled? (
/xmlrpc.php— can be used for brute force, SSRF, DoS) - User enumeration via
/?author=1,/?author=2, etc. - Login page accessible? (
/wp-login.php) - WP-Cron accessible? (
/wp-cron.php) - Debug mode enabled? (error messages in responses)
- Directory listing in
/wp-content/uploads/
Step 6: Results
Save findings to wpscan-{target}.md in the project directory, organized by:
- WordPress version and update status
- Vulnerable plugins/themes with CVEs
- Enumerated users
- Accessible sensitive endpoints
- Custom theme/plugin findings
- Recommended exploitation paths
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 61 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 004a0c902836
wpscan is a command published in the GitHub repository ogrodev/fsociety (20 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 526 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
pentest
Activate pentest mode — displays ASCII art, configures session isolation, collects engagement scope, then OWNS the engagement: pre-flight, recon, planning (via the pentester-orchestrator planner), executor dispatch, a time-budget quota loop, aggregation, and report generation.
pentest-scope
Define or update engagement scope — saves scope to disk without launching a pentest. Can be run before or during an engagement. If a pentest is active and the target changes drastically, warns the operator and suggests a new engagement.
pentest-attacks
Define the attack profile for an engagement — select which attack categories and skills to use. Saves to .pentest-attacks.json. If run before /pentest:pentest, the orchestrator will respect the selection. If run standalone, does not launch a pentest.
pentest-kali
Connect to a Metasploit-Kali Server (MKS) REST API — verifies connectivity, discovers available Kali tools, and configures agents to prefer MKS endpoints over local Bash equivalents.
pentest-exit
Close pentest session — summarizes findings, ensures outputs are saved, lifts isolation, and prompts for /clear.
bb-ad
Active Directory enumeration and attack techniques. Includes LDAP enumeration, Kerberos attacks (Kerberoasting, AS-REP Roasting), SMB attacks, and domain privilege escalation. Use this when targeting Windows domain environments.