Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Stickman230/claude-pentestWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/stickman230/claude-pentest/pentest-scope)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/stickman230/claude-pentest/pentest-scope"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/stickman230/claude-pentest/pentest-scope.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.02040 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01020 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00408 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00204 |
Grade A, and why
pentest-scope scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 203 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Output the following banner verbatim:
============================================================
[SCOPE DEFINITION]
============================================================
Step 1 — Detect Existing Scope
Try to Read .pentest-scope.json.
If the file exists and is valid JSON, extract these fields and store them:
existing_target— the saved target valueexisting_engagement— the saved engagement nameexisting_out_of_scope— the saved out-of-scope valueexisting_auth— the saved auth valueexisting_timing— the saved time budget / quota (for backward compatibility: iftimingis absent but a legacywindowfield exists, usewindow)existing_thoroughness— the saved thoroughness level (light, medium, deep, or full)existing_output_formats— the saved deliverable formats array (default[]if absent)existing_status— either"pending"(not yet launched) or"active"(pentest in progress)
Set has_existing_scope = true.
If the file does not exist or cannot be parsed, set has_existing_scope = false.
Step 2 — Show Existing Scope (if present)
If has_existing_scope = true, output this block with real values substituted in:
============================================================
EXISTING SCOPE FOUND
============================================================
Target: {existing_target}
Engagement: {existing_engagement}
Out-of-scope: {existing_out_of_scope}
Auth: {existing_auth}
Time budget: {existing_timing}
Thoroughness: {existing_thoroughness}
Deliverables: report.md + pentest-report.json{, plus existing_output_formats if any}
Status: {existing_status}
============================================================
Then use AskUserQuestion to ask:
"What would you like to do with the existing scope?"
Present exactly these options:
- "Update scope — define a new scope (replaces the existing one)"
- "Cancel — keep the existing scope as-is"
If the user selects "Cancel — keep the existing scope as-is", output:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 203 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A bc3f29532cbb
pentest-scope is a command published in the GitHub repository Stickman230/claude-pentest (99 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 2,040 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
unpack
Detect and remove binary packing/protection.
dashboard
Show running scans, system health, and engagement status.
apiscan
API security audit — REST, GraphQL, JWT analysis, parameter discovery.
bruteforce
Password brute force and hash cracking against target services.
dirscan
Directory and content discovery with recursive crawling.
enumerate
Network service enumeration — SMB, RPC, NetBIOS, LDAP.