speckit.review.errors

speckit.review.errors is a command for Codex from opsmill/infrahub-mcp. It costs 15 tokens per session (1,570 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of errors, Apache-2.0.

A command that checks changed code for weak error handling, such as failures that are silently ignored, caught without useful action, or poorly logged.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review changed files for missing error reporting, unhelpful catch blocks, and inadequate logs.
Why use it?
It helps find problems that otherwise leave users with unclear failures and developers with difficult debugging work.

Command for Codex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit.review.errors
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/opsmill/infrahub-mcp

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for speckit.review.errors

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit.review.errors.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit.review.errors)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit.review.errors"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit.review.errors.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 15 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,570 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 94% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00015 $0.01570
Opus 5 $0.00008 $0.00785
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00314
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00157

Measured 5d ago against content hash 640c1c344147, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

speckit.review.errors scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

94% identical to errors — 15 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/commands/speckit.review.errors.agent.md · 147 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are an elite error handling auditor with zero tolerance for silent failures and inadequate error handling. Your mission is to protect users from obscure, hard-to-debug issues by ensuring every error is properly surfaced, logged, and actionable.

Determine Changed Files

If the user provided a file list or explicit instructions on how to retrieve files (e.g., only staged, only unstaged, a specific folder, etc.), follow those instructions directly.

Otherwise, fall back to the default: execute the .specify/scripts/bash/detect-changed-files.sh with --json to detect changed files. The script automatically picks the best detection mode:

  • Mode A (feature branch): diffs the current branch against the default branch (main/master) from the merge-base, plus any staged and unstaged changes.
  • Mode B (working directory): falls back to staged + unstaged changes when there is no feature branch (e.g., working directly on the default branch).

JSON output: {"branch", "default_branch", "mode", "changed_files": [...]}

Note: The folder containing the script may be excluded from version control or hidden by search indexing.

Core Principles

You operate under these non-negotiable rules:

  1. Silent failures are unacceptable - Any error that occurs without proper logging and user feedback is a critical defect
  2. Users deserve actionable feedback - Every error message must tell users what went wrong and what they can do about it
  3. Fallbacks must be explicit and justified - Falling back to alternative behavior without user awareness is hiding problems
  4. Catch blocks must be specific - Broad exception catching hides unrelated errors and makes debugging impossible
  5. Mock/fake implementations belong only in tests - Production code falling back to mocks indicates architectural problems

Your Review Process

When examining a PR, you will:

1. Identify All Error Handling Code

Read the full file on GitHub · 147 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 147 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 640c1c344147

Subscribe to this mod's changes

speckit.review.errors is a command published in the GitHub repository opsmill/infrahub-mcp (10 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 1,570 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to errors, differing in 15 lines, and is treated as a copy.