Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/implement-spec-frontend)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/implement-spec-frontend"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/implement-spec-frontend/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/implement-spec-frontend"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/implement-spec-frontend.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.01495 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00598 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00299 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00150 |
Grade A, and why
implement-spec-frontend scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/implement-spec-frontend — Implement an approved frontend redesign
Purpose
Implement an approved /spec-frontend artifact faithfully, then prove the
redesign in the rendered product with independent specialist review.
Invocation
/implement-spec-frontend <spec name or path>
Accepted input
An approved .agent/specs/*.md file with work_type: frontend-redesign,
baseline conditions, an implementation plan, and browser acceptance scenarios.
Prerequisites
- The spec exists, is readable, and has
status: approved. - The target route, preview, stable fixture/data, and required source paths are available.
- Material brand, product, information-architecture, dependency, and shared design-system decisions are already approved.
Procedure
- Read the entire spec and confirm
generated_by: spec,work_type: frontend-redesign,status: approved, repository revision, source paths, preservation constraints, requirements, tasks, tests, browser scenarios, and approval-sensitive decisions. Stop if the spec is unapproved. - Apply
context-discovery, then verify change-sensitive claims against source. If the target, design system, route behavior, fixtures, or relevant source has materially drifted, return to/spec-frontendfor an amendment; do not reinterpret a stale direction while coding. - Reproduce the spec's baseline before editing with
browser-visual-validation. Use identical route, data, state, viewport, theme, and interaction conditions. If comparison conditions changed, repair the fixture or stop—the final cannot be compared against a different baseline. - Load and apply the curated canonical skills required by the approved scope:
frontend-guidelines,code-quality-guidelines,frontend-design-direction,visual-craft,design-system-integration,ui-state-design,responsive-ui-engineering,accessible-ui-engineering,motion-design,test-design, andbrowser-visual-validation. Loadarchitecture-guidelinesonly for approved shared frontend architecture, routing, data-flow, or design-system ownership changes. - Inspect active packs. If more than one primary aesthetic pack is enabled,
stop and ask the user to choose exactly one; do not rely on priority order to
reconcile contradictory visual directions. Otherwise apply at most one
explicitly enabled primary aesthetic pack
(
frontend-design,taste-skill, orui-ux-pro-max) plus optionalemil-design-engineering. Do not silently enable packs, blend conflicts, fetch remote prompts, execute upstream installers/scripts, or add a dependency because a third-party skill prefers it. - Hand the approved brief, context capsule, reuse map, preservation list,
tasks, and acceptance matrix to
frontend-implementer. Use one coherent production-code writer by default; do not assign overlapping UI files to parallel agents. Parallelize only truly independent read-only research, isolated tests, or non-overlapping assets explicitly marked safe by the spec. - Implement in dependency order: semantics and content, state/behavior, structure and responsive transitions, visual system, then justified interaction/motion. Reuse local primitives, keep scope coherent, and add the specified unit/component/E2E/visual/accessibility tests.
- Run independent final checks, in parallel when native isolated subagents are
available and otherwise as honestly labelled separated passes:
visual-qa-tester: like-for-like baseline/final browser comparison, relevant viewports/states/themes/zoom/long content, console, and network;accessibility-reviewer: keyboard, focus, semantics, names/states, contrast, reflow, reduced motion, forms, and recovery;visual-craft-specialist: approved direction, hierarchy, typography, color, spacing, density, alignment, shape, icon/image, and anti-slop fidelity;ux-reviewer: named task outcome, comprehension, friction, copy, and recovery;motion-design-reviewerwhen interaction or motion changed: purpose, responsiveness, interruption, reduced motion, and performance.
- Consolidate only reproducible, in-scope blockers. Have
frontend-implementerperform at most one correction pass, then re-run the affected checks. Do not create a hidden unbounded loop. If blockers remain, stop with evidence and use the configurableimprove-ui-uxloop only when the user explicitly wants additional bounded iterations. - Run configured gates. Write or update
.agent/evidence/ui/<spec-name>/report.mdwith baseline/final conditions, evidence paths, changed files, requirement coverage, specialist execution mode and verdicts, states/viewports, accessibility, motion, console/network, tests/gates, deviations, remaining blockers, and untested coverage.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 125 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 1d315f21071e
implement-spec-frontend is a command published in the GitHub repository Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,495 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
profile
Save, load, inspect, update, reset, or delete diagram-design client profiles.
erne-animate
ERNE — Implement animations using the ui-designer agent with Reanimated and Gesture Handler.
ui-flow-review
Review menus, HUD, navigation, and player flow from a UX perspective.
responsive-design-specialist
Use when a layout breaks between sizes. Arbitrary breakpoints, type that does not scale, images that blow out the grid, or a desktop design retrofitted onto mobile.
design-audit
Audit the rendered design of live sites. Evidence capture first, then one critique per site. Argument is a URL, a repo name, or all.
ppt-image2-editable-rebuild
Rebuild image2 or imagegen reference slides as editable PowerPoint decks.