Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/othmanadi/mddesign/critiquegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OthmanAdi/MDDesignWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00049 | $0.00475 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00237 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00095 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
critique scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/mddesign:critique
Five-pass audit of the project's DESIGN.md against the actual code.
Passes
- Structural — delegate to
npx @google/design.md lint --json. 7 Google linter rules. - Drift — tokens declared but never used (orphans), colors/fonts used in code but not declared (leaks), near-duplicate tokens (ΔE < 5 for colors, ±1px for radii).
- Accessibility — WCAG AA/AAA contrast on declared color pairs, missing focus-ring token, missing reduced-motion fallback when animation tokens exist.
- Completeness — component states (hover/active/focus/disabled/error), dark-mode counterparts, responsive breakpoints.
- Consistency — spacing/radius/font-size scales check for geometric progression.
Output
Writes DESIGN.md.critique.md at project root, adjacent to DESIGN.md. Each finding has:
- Stable id (
F1,F2, ...) - Severity (P0 P1 P2 P3)
- Category (structural / drift / accessibility / completeness / consistency)
- Short title
- Evidence (file paths, line numbers, counts)
- Proposed fix
/mddesign:fix <id>slash command
Appends a one-line summary to progress.md.
Pre-flight
GlobDESIGN.mdat project root. If absent, refuse with "Run/mddesign:harvestfirst."- Verify
npxreachable.
Boundaries
- Read-only on
DESIGN.md(no edits). - Writes only
DESIGN.md.critique.md(and appends toprogress.md). - Never calls
/mddesign:fixitself; that is a separate user action.
See skills/design-harvest/SKILL.md for the full five-pass logic.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 44 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 56ba39ab3ba5
critique is a command published in the GitHub repository OthmanAdi/MDDesign (13 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 475 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
work
通过 v3 流程发起正式工作请求 (entry gate).
tdd
Guide Test-Driven Development workflow (Red-Green-Refactor).
verify
Run comprehensive pre-PR verification (5-phase quality check).
commit-push-pr
Create git commit, push to remote, and create/merge pull request.
gha
Analyze GitHub Actions CI failures.
handoff
Generate context handoff document for session continuity.