review

A review command that checks local Git changes with an AnyModel reviewer. Git is a tool for tracking file changes; a review examines code without modifying it.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing working-tree changes, staged changes, untracked files, or differences from a base branch, either immediately or in the background.
Why use it?
It surfaces possible problems in the selected changes while keeping the review separate from fixing or applying patches.

Command

Part of the anymodel plugin — 11 commands, 1 agent shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/pealmeida/anymodel-plugin/review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pealmeida/anymodel-plugin

Or install anymodel, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 11 commands, 1 agent.

Per session 10 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 789 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 84% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00010 $0.00789
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00394
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00158
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00079

Measured 2d ago against content hash 9f7d0d991a40, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

84% identical to review — 28 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

plugins/anymodel/commands/review.md · 62 lines

What it actually says

Run an AnyModel review through the engine's native reviewer when supported, or fall back to the schema-review path.

Raw slash-command arguments: $ARGUMENTS

Core constraint:

  • This command is review-only.
  • Do not fix issues, apply patches, or suggest that you are about to make changes.
  • Your only job is to run the review and return the engine's output verbatim to the user.

Execution mode rules:

  • If the raw arguments include --wait, do not ask. Run the review in the foreground.
  • If the raw arguments include --background, do not ask. Run the review in a Claude background task.
  • Otherwise, estimate the review size before asking:
    • For working-tree review, start with git status --short --untracked-files=all.
    • For working-tree review, also inspect both git diff --shortstat --cached and git diff --shortstat.
    • For base-branch review, use git diff --shortstat <base>...HEAD.
    • Treat untracked files or directories as reviewable work for auto or working-tree review even when git diff --shortstat is empty.
    • Only conclude there is nothing to review when the relevant scope is actually empty.
    • Recommend waiting only when the scoped review is clearly tiny, roughly 1-2 files total and no sign of a broader directory-sized change.
    • In every other case, including unclear size, recommend background.
    • When in doubt, run the review instead of declaring that there is nothing to review.
  • Then use AskUserQuestion exactly once with two options, putting the recommended option first and suffixing its label with (Recommended):
    • Wait for results
    • Run in background

Argument handling:

  • Preserve the user's arguments exactly.
  • Do not strip --wait or --background yourself.
  • Do not add extra review instructions or rewrite the user's intent.
  • The companion script parses --wait and --background, but Claude Code's Bash(..., run_in_background: true) is what actually detaches the run.
  • /anymodel:review uses the native reviewer when the engine supports it (e.g. codex via review/start); other engines fall back to the schema-review path.
  • It does not support staged-only review, unstaged-only review, or extra focus text.
  • If the user needs custom review instructions or more adversarial framing, they should use /anymodel:adversarial-review.

Foreground flow:

  • Run:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"
  • Return the command stdout verbatim, exactly as-is.
  • Do not paraphrase, summarize, or add commentary before or after it.
  • Do not fix any issues mentioned in the review output.

Background flow:

  • Launch the review with Bash in the background:
Bash({
  command: `node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"`,
  description: "AnyModel review",
  run_in_background: true
})
  • Do not call BashOutput or wait for completion in this turn.
  • After launching the command, tell the user: "AnyModel review started in the background. Check /anymodel:status for progress."
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 62 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 9f7d0d991a40

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a command published in the GitHub repository pealmeida/anymodel-plugin (0 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 789 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 84% identical to review, differing in 28 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other commands, from other repositories

/commit-push

Commit and push all changes from this chat session using Conventional Commits.

DataCovey/nornweave · 18 tokens

/release

Release a new version — updates CHANGELOG, pyproject.toml, creates git tag, and pushes.

DataCovey/nornweave · 23 tokens

mega-approve

Approve the mega-plan and start feature execution. Creates worktrees and generates PRDs for each feature. Usage: /plan-cascade:mega-approve [--flow ] [--tdd ] [--confirm] [--no-confirm] [--spec ] [--first-principles] [--max-questions N] [--auto-prd] [--agent ] [--prd-agent ] [--impl-agent ].

Taoidle/plan-cascade · 110 tokens

auto

AI auto strategy executor. Analyzes task and automatically selects and executes the best strategy: direct execution, hybrid-auto PRD generation, hybrid-worktree isolated development, or mega-plan multi-feature orchestration.

Taoidle/plan-cascade · 41 tokens

hybrid-auto

Generate PRD from task description and enter review mode. Auto-generates user stories with priorities, dependencies, and acceptance criteria for parallel execution. Usage: /plan-cascade:hybrid-auto [--flow ] [--tdd ] [--confirm] [--no-confirm] [--spec ] [--first-principles] [--max-questions N] [--agent ]…

Taoidle/plan-cascade · 107 tokens

hybrid-worktree

Start a new task in an isolated Git worktree with Hybrid Ralph PRD mode. Creates worktree, branch, loads existing PRD or auto-generates from description. Usage: /plan-cascade:hybrid-worktree [--flow ] [--tdd ] [--confirm] [--no-confirm] [--spec ] [--first-principles] [--max-questions N] [--agent ] [design-doc-path].

Taoidle/plan-cascade · 125 tokens