Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/pealmeida/anymodel-plugin/reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pealmeida/anymodel-pluginWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00789 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00394 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
84% identical to review — 28 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Run an AnyModel review through the engine's native reviewer when supported, or fall back to the schema-review path.
Raw slash-command arguments:
$ARGUMENTS
Core constraint:
- This command is review-only.
- Do not fix issues, apply patches, or suggest that you are about to make changes.
- Your only job is to run the review and return the engine's output verbatim to the user.
Execution mode rules:
- If the raw arguments include
--wait, do not ask. Run the review in the foreground. - If the raw arguments include
--background, do not ask. Run the review in a Claude background task. - Otherwise, estimate the review size before asking:
- For working-tree review, start with
git status --short --untracked-files=all. - For working-tree review, also inspect both
git diff --shortstat --cachedandgit diff --shortstat. - For base-branch review, use
git diff --shortstat <base>...HEAD. - Treat untracked files or directories as reviewable work for auto or working-tree review even when
git diff --shortstatis empty. - Only conclude there is nothing to review when the relevant scope is actually empty.
- Recommend waiting only when the scoped review is clearly tiny, roughly 1-2 files total and no sign of a broader directory-sized change.
- In every other case, including unclear size, recommend background.
- When in doubt, run the review instead of declaring that there is nothing to review.
- For working-tree review, start with
- Then use
AskUserQuestionexactly once with two options, putting the recommended option first and suffixing its label with(Recommended):Wait for resultsRun in background
Argument handling:
- Preserve the user's arguments exactly.
- Do not strip
--waitor--backgroundyourself. - Do not add extra review instructions or rewrite the user's intent.
- The companion script parses
--waitand--background, but Claude Code'sBash(..., run_in_background: true)is what actually detaches the run. /anymodel:reviewuses the native reviewer when the engine supports it (e.g.codexviareview/start); other engines fall back to the schema-review path.- It does not support staged-only review, unstaged-only review, or extra focus text.
- If the user needs custom review instructions or more adversarial framing, they should use
/anymodel:adversarial-review.
Foreground flow:
- Run:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"
- Return the command stdout verbatim, exactly as-is.
- Do not paraphrase, summarize, or add commentary before or after it.
- Do not fix any issues mentioned in the review output.
Background flow:
- Launch the review with
Bashin the background:
Bash({
command: `node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"`,
description: "AnyModel review",
run_in_background: true
})
- Do not call
BashOutputor wait for completion in this turn. - After launching the command, tell the user: "AnyModel review started in the background. Check
/anymodel:statusfor progress."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 62 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 9f7d0d991a40
review is a command published in the GitHub repository pealmeida/anymodel-plugin (0 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 789 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 84% identical to review, differing in 28 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
/commit-push
Commit and push all changes from this chat session using Conventional Commits.
/release
Release a new version — updates CHANGELOG, pyproject.toml, creates git tag, and pushes.
mega-approve
Approve the mega-plan and start feature execution. Creates worktrees and generates PRDs for each feature. Usage: /plan-cascade:mega-approve [--flow ] [--tdd ] [--confirm] [--no-confirm] [--spec ] [--first-principles] [--max-questions N] [--auto-prd] [--agent ] [--prd-agent ] [--impl-agent ].
auto
AI auto strategy executor. Analyzes task and automatically selects and executes the best strategy: direct execution, hybrid-auto PRD generation, hybrid-worktree isolated development, or mega-plan multi-feature orchestration.
hybrid-auto
Generate PRD from task description and enter review mode. Auto-generates user stories with priorities, dependencies, and acceptance criteria for parallel execution. Usage: /plan-cascade:hybrid-auto [--flow ] [--tdd ] [--confirm] [--no-confirm] [--spec ] [--first-principles] [--max-questions N] [--agent ]…
hybrid-worktree
Start a new task in an isolated Git worktree with Hybrid Ralph PRD mode. Creates worktree, branch, loads existing PRD or auto-generates from description. Usage: /plan-cascade:hybrid-worktree [--flow ] [--tdd ] [--confirm] [--no-confirm] [--spec ] [--first-principles] [--max-questions N] [--agent ] [design-doc-path].