Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skymanbp/cc-treeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/skymanbp/cc-tree/code-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/skymanbp/cc-tree/code-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/skymanbp/cc-tree/code-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/skymanbp/cc-tree/code-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/skymanbp/cc-tree/code-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00098 | $0.00307 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00039 | $0.00123 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00061 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
code-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 25d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Invoke the tree skill with the code-audit preset. The default
output directory is code-audit-out/<UTCdate>__<target-slug>/
(override with --out).
Run:
/cc-tree:tree $ARGUMENTS --preset code-audit
If $ARGUMENTS doesn't include a path, the engine will report
EARLY_STOP=root_unparseable — point it at a file or directory.
Preset details: presets/code-audit.md.
Engine spec: docs/ENGINE.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 25d ago Changed dee1c6b57881
- 1mo ago First seen · 21 lines · 98 tokens per session scan A c8dca61dd09e
code-audit is a command published in the GitHub repository skymanbp/cc-tree (102 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 98 tokens to every session and 307 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
adversarial-review
Coordinated three-lens adversarial review (chaos + simplifier + adversarial-reviewer) against a PRD, build plan, validation report, code, or proposal — with a fixed must-fix rubric, a mechanical pre-gate, and drift detection on the review itself.
quality-review
Run the 3-agent quality review (simplifier + adversarial-reviewer + chaos-engineer) against a plan, file, or proposal.
adversarial
Run only the adversarial-reviewer (Opus) against a target. Challenges claims and assumptions; finds logical gaps.
simplify
Run only the simplifier (Sonnet) against a target. Finds over-engineering, premature abstraction, and unnecessary indirection.
daily-review
Review yesterday's activity across Gmail, Google Drive, Google Calendar, and update the life-crm Notion workspace accordingly. Use the notion-governance rules for all writes.
refactor-clean
Refactor provided code for cleanliness, maintainability, and alignment with SOLID principles and modern best practices — no over-engineering.