Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/phuonghx/aim-cli/reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/phuonghx/aim-cliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/phuonghx/aim-cli/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/phuonghx/aim-cli/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/phuonghx/aim-cli/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00207 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00103 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00041 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review Checklist
Perform a code review of the target files or staged changes. Focus on:
- Correctness & Logic: Are there logic errors, boundary conditions missed, or off-by-one issues?
- Security & Vulnerabilities: Are there hardcoded secrets, injection vectors, unvalidated inputs, or authorization gaps?
- Readability & Code Style: Does the code match the project conventions? Is naming clear and descriptive? Are there too many nested blocks?
- Error Handling: Are errors caught and handled gracefully? Are resources closed in finalizers/try-catch?
- Testing: Are there associated unit tests for the new changes? Are the tests thorough?
Present your feedback in a structured format:
- Files/Lines Reviewed
- Issues Found (categorized by severity: Security, Bug, Style, Enhancement)
- Suggested Improvements with code snippets.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 19 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A bb31522cc3b7
review is a command published in the GitHub repository phuonghx/aim-cli (1 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 207 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
critique-ux
Run a focused UX critique on a screen — affordances, information density, and hierarchy — and output a prioritised fix list.
design-onboarding
Design a first-run experience end to end — activation path, progressive disclosure, and time to first value.
frame-problem
Structure an ambiguous design challenge into a clear problem definition with constraints and criteria.
strategize
Develop a complete UX strategy for a product or feature area.
release
Prepare a release by updating docs and bumping the version.
eg-fix-bug
Fix a bug using the elephant/goldfish workflow — problem doc, goldfish diagnosis check, failing test, fix, review, validate.