Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HthSolid/claude-dejavuWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hthsolid/claude-dejavu/dejavu-lint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hthsolid/claude-dejavu/dejavu-lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hthsolid/claude-dejavu/dejavu-lint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hthsolid/claude-dejavu/dejavu-lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hthsolid/claude-dejavu/dejavu-lint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00284 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00114 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00057 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
dejavu-lint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 7dda10c58e48
dejavu-lint is a command published in the GitHub repository HthSolid/claude-dejavu (6 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 284 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
assemble-team
Assemble a pre-built agent team for parallel work - review, feature, debug, cross-platform, full-stack, or research.
review-code
Trigger a comprehensive code review on recent changes or specified files.
code-review
Review staged git changes for bugs, security issues, and style violations.
amby.converge
Check the codebase against spec, plan, and tasks after implementing; append gap tasks, never edit code.
cg-senior-code-review
Perform deep, findings-first senior engineering code reviews of any change in any language or stack. Use when reviewing a phase, feature branch, pull request, commit, or uncommitted changes for correctness bugs, security and abuse risks, regressions to existing behavior, concurrency and lifecycle defects, performance…
review
Perform a comprehensive code review focusing on style, bugs, and security.