Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pleaseai/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/get)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/get"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/get/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/get"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/get.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00368 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00184 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
get scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Pull a teammate's branch (and its full stack) into the local repo so you can review, extend, or build on top. User input: $ARGUMENTS.
Steps
- Confirm the working tree is clean (
git status --short). If not, ask the user to commit or stash first. - Run
gt get <branch>. Graphite fetches the branch and every ancestor up to trunk, tracking each one. - Branches arrive frozen by default — local edits are blocked until they're unfrozen. To start contributing immediately, run with
--unfrozen. - Run
gt lsto show the user the new stack alongside any existing local stacks.
After fetching
To extend a teammate's stack:
gt co <their-branch> # navigate to it
gt unfreeze <their-branch> # if you'll modify it; otherwise skip
# make changes
gt create -am "your addition" # stack your branch on top
gt submit # opens your own PR
To just review without editing, leave the branch frozen — gt sync will still keep it current with the remote.
Key flags
-d, --downstack— fetch only this branch's ancestors (default is full stack)-u, --remote-upstack— also fetch children pushed by the teammate--unfrozen— bring in unfrozen so local edits are immediately allowed-f, --force— overwrite any local copies of the same branch
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 35 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A c239a171d614
get is a command published in the GitHub repository pleaseai/claude-code-plugins (13 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 368 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other commands, from other repositories
devkit.github.review-pr
Provides comprehensive GitHub pull request review with code quality, security, and best practices analysis. Use when reviewing a PR before merging.
speckit.spex.submit
Push and create PR for team review, with optional watch mode for CI monitoring.
git
The pre-finish status: branch, hygiene findings, message checks, workflow lint, template state.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
code-review
Code review for branch changes. Analyzes git diff between branches with multi-level depth (low/medium/high). Matches changes against task description. Returns structured report with severity levels and verdict.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.