Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pleaseai/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/graphite)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/graphite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/graphite/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/graphite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/graphite.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
graphite scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "graphite",
"version": "2.3.0",
"description": "Stacked PR workflow with the Graphite CLI (gt) — create stacks, submit, sync, restack, split/squash/fold, track existing branches, and collaborate on shared stacks",
"author": {
"name": "Graphite",
"url": "https://github.com/withgraphite"
},
"homepage": "https://graphite.com/docs",
"repository": "https://github.com/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins",
"license": "MIT",
"keywords": [
"graphite",
"gt",
"stacked-prs",
"stacking",
"git",
"github",
"pull-request",
"code-review"
]
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 3 skills, 16 commands travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 639 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
- Skill graphite-merge-queue A 140 tokens
- Skill graphite A 108 tokens
- Skill graphite-setup A 161 tokens
- Command merge-queue A 15 tokens
- Command modify A 20 tokens
- Command get A 13 tokens
- Command create A 13 tokens
- Command restack A 16 tokens
- Command split A 11 tokens
- Command submit A 13 tokens
- Command track A 14 tokens
- Command absorb A 15 tokens
- Command checkout A 17 tokens
- Command fold A 11 tokens
- Command move A 19 tokens
- Command reorder A 12 tokens
- Command squash A 14 tokens
- Command sync A 15 tokens
- Command log A 12 tokens
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 23 lines scan A 517a11965f9d
graphite is a plugin published in the GitHub repository pleaseai/claude-code-plugins (13 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other plugins, from other repositories
review-toolkit
Comprehensive PR review pipeline: a pre-review readiness gate (stops on merge conflicts or red code-related CI with a fix-it note, no verdict), branch-level analysis with merge-base attribution (the verdict is decided only by defects the diff introduced, worsened, or interacts with — purely pre-existing defects are…
git-pr
Committing, PR creation and review triage, and dependency upgrades.
hunch
A git-native reasoning graph of decisions, bugs, and invariants for your codebase — queried and enforced at reasoning time. Adds the hunch MCP tools plus /hunch:capture, /hunch:heal, /hunch:why, /hunch:fix, /hunch:fragile.
git
Git workflow tools: commits, PRs, review inbox, checkout, and work triage.
ci-review
CI-optimized code review: multi-agent parallel review with confidence scoring and atomic GitHub PR review posting via gh api.
cadence
A plan/execute/verify loop for a single developer in Claude Code, with adversarial review at every gate: plans and diffs get refuted by a fresh Claude subagent or a panel of outside models (OpenAI, Gemini, DeepSeek), not just approved. State lives in files, not the conversation, so you clear aggressively and keep both.