Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pleaseai/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/submit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/submit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/submit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/submit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/submit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00444 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00222 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00089 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
submit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Submit the current Graphite stack to the remote and open or update pull requests. User input: $ARGUMENTS.
Decide scope
- Default
gt submitpushes the current branch and everything downstack from it. gt submit --stack(aliasgt ss) pushes the entire stack rooted at trunk.gt submit --stack --update-only(gt ss -u) updates PRs only — won't open new ones.
If the user didn't specify scope and the stack has more than one branch, ask whether they want --stack or just the current branch + downstack.
Steps
- Run
gt lsand show the user which branches will be submitted. - Run
git status --shortto confirm there are no uncommitted changes. If there are, ask whether togt modify -athem in first, stash, or abort. - Run
gt sync --no-pullorgt restackifgt lsshows any branch asneeds restack— do not submit a stale stack. - Run the appropriate
gt submitcommand. Pass-c/--confirmto skip interactive prompts only if the user asked for non-interactive. - Report each created/updated PR URL from the output.
Key flags
--stack— submit every branch in the stack (not just current + downstack)--update-only,-u— update existing PRs, never create new ones--draft— open as draft-c, --confirm— skip the interactive prompts-e, --edit— open$EDITORfor each PR description-f, --force— force-push (use with care; Graphite already uses--force-with-leaseby default)--ai— Graphite drafts the PR title/body
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 34 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A fa581bddb1a2
submit is a command published in the GitHub repository pleaseai/claude-code-plugins (13 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 444 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other commands, from other repositories
land
Cadence-tick autonomous PR babysitter (CI-fix, resolve, converge, merge, close, release).
release-notes
Generate consistent, well-structured release notes from git history. Triggered on release tags following semver patterns (v..) to produce categorized changelog with breaking changes, features, fixes, and contributor attribution.
ship
Ship is the operational release-prep flow for a connected project repo.
release-plan
A release-planning command for a software change. It documents the release scope, rollback plan, gradual or full rollout, and monitoring before waiting for human approval.
release
Standalone SDK release command for the BUILD repo. Not a workspace phase — runs independently after any number of implement/redteam cycles. Handles PyPI publishing, documentation deployment, and CI management for the kailash Python SDK and its framework packages.
create-pr
Push the current branch and open a pull request into main with a structured description derived from the branch's commits and issue references.