Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/psi-oss/get-physics-doneWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/psi-oss/get-physics-done/debug)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/psi-oss/get-physics-done/debug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/psi-oss/get-physics-done/debug/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/psi-oss/get-physics-done/debug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/psi-oss/get-physics-done/debug.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00439 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00176 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
gpd:debug scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 53 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A f3b27c21a873
gpd:debug is a command published in the GitHub repository psi-oss/get-physics-done (971 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 439 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
eg-fix-bug
Fix a bug using the elephant/goldfish workflow — problem doc, goldfish diagnosis check, failing test, fix, review, validate.
refactor-clean
Refactor provided code for cleanliness, maintainability, and alignment with SOLID principles and modern best practices — no over-engineering.
doctor
Diagnose a broken llm-router setup.
fix-bug
Systematically reproduce, isolate, fix, test, and document a bug.
test-maintenance
Maintain and evolve a Katalon True Platform/TestOps regression suite as the application changes. Use when you need to detect which tests broke or became flaky from stability and result history, diagnose whether a case needs repair vs regeneration, repair test assets (update, move, reorganize cases), refresh coverage…
me-cfd-review
Review thermal-fluid CFD setup, boundary conditions, mesh, wall treatment, convergence, validation, and whether the claims are supported.