Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/QuasarByte/feature-driven-flow-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/quasarbyte/feature-driven-flow-claude/fdf-validate-effective-artifacts)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/quasarbyte/feature-driven-flow-claude/fdf-validate-effective-artifacts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/quasarbyte/feature-driven-flow-claude/fdf-validate-effective-artifacts/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/quasarbyte/feature-driven-flow-claude/fdf-validate-effective-artifacts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/quasarbyte/feature-driven-flow-claude/fdf-validate-effective-artifacts.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00192 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00077 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00038 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
fdf-validate-effective-artifacts scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Task: $ARGUMENTS
Requirements:
- If
$ARGUMENTSincludes a specific path, validate that target artifact. - If no path is provided, validate default/template artifacts and known repo-local defaults.
- Validate against schemas:
fdf/schemas/fdf-effective-matrix.schema.jsonfdf/schemas/fdf-effective-instructions-bundle.schema.jsonfdf/schemas/fdf-effective-instructions-compact.schema.jsonfdf/schemas/fdf-effective-instructions-bundle-portable.schema.jsonfdf/schemas/fdf-effective-instructions-compact-portable.schema.json
- Apply path/policy expectations from settings where relevant.
- Return a concise pass/fail report with concrete file paths and issues.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 19 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A b3fd1ad959e7
fdf-validate-effective-artifacts is a command published in the GitHub repository QuasarByte/feature-driven-flow-claude (6 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 192 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
prototype
You are building a proof-of-concept for the current Grainulator sprint. Read CLAUDE.md for sprint context and claims.json for existing research claims.
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
verify
Run repository verification using the verification-loop skill.
modernize-transform
Transform one legacy module to the target stack — idiomatic rewrite with behavior-equivalence tests.
constraints
A command for defining a project's quality standards through a short interview and a written CONSTRAINTS.md file. It records checks, thresholds, exceptions, and commands for enforcing them.
check-dev
Type-check a Z specification with fuzz.