Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/plugin install xorioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/tests/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/tests.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00801 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00320 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 90 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Command
Generate tests for code in scope. Detects language, analyzes coverage gaps and anti-patterns, then generates idiomatic tests.
Argument Parsing
Parse $ARGUMENTS to determine scope and options:
- No arguments → diff scope: run
git diff HEADto find changed files --project→ project scope: analyze the entire project for coverage gaps- A file or directory path (anything that isn't a flag) → module scope: analyze that path
--no-docs→ skip the documentation review step (can combine with any scope)
Examples:
/xorio:tests→ diff scope/xorio:tests src/auth→ module scope onsrc/auth/xorio:tests --project→ full project scan/xorio:tests src/auth --no-docs→ module scope, skip doc review/xorio:tests --project --no-docs→ full project, skip doc review
Workflow
Step 1: Detect Languages
Based on the files in scope, detect languages and frameworks:
Languages:
.rsfiles orCargo.tomlpresent → Rust.ts/.tsxfiles orpackage.jsonpresent → TypeScript.pyfiles orpyproject.toml/setup.pypresent → Python
Frameworks (check dependency files):
Cargo.tomlcontainsegui→ eguipackage.jsoncontainsreact→ Reactpackage.jsoncontainsvue→ Vue.jspackage.jsoncontainsthree→ Three.jspackage.jsoncontainsspark→ SparkJSDockerfileordocker-compose.ymlexists → Docker- AWS SDK deps, CDK, CloudFormation, or SAM templates → AWS
Step 2: Load Standards
Read ONLY the matching standards files from the plugin's skill references directory:
- Language:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/tests/references/test-standards-{language}.md - Framework:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/tests/references/test-standards-{framework}.md
Step 3: Analyze
Launch the test-analyzer agent with:
- Diff scope: include the
git diff HEADoutput - Module scope: the path provided by the user
- Project scope: instruction to scan the full project
- The matching language + framework standards content
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 90 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A db6e9b843532
tests is a command published in the GitHub repository radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin (3 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 801 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
prototype
You are building a proof-of-concept for the current Grainulator sprint. Read CLAUDE.md for sprint context and claims.json for existing research claims.
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
verify
Run repository verification using the verification-loop skill.
modernize-transform
Transform one legacy module to the target stack — idiomatic rewrite with behavior-equivalence tests.
constraints
A command for defining a project's quality standards through a short interview and a written CONSTRAINTS.md file. It records checks, thresholds, exceptions, and commands for enforcing them.
check-dev
Type-check a Z specification with fuzz.