Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rahulkeerthi/expo-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rahulkeerthi/expo-toolkit/android-preflight)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rahulkeerthi/expo-toolkit/android-preflight"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rahulkeerthi/expo-toolkit/android-preflight/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rahulkeerthi/expo-toolkit/android-preflight"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rahulkeerthi/expo-toolkit/android-preflight.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.04748 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.01899 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00950 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00475 |
Grade A, and why
android-preflight scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 662 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Google Play Console Pre-flight Check
Validate Google Play Console configuration before submission to catch common issues and policy violations.
Setup Questionnaire
Before running checks, gather information about the user's setup using AskUserQuestion:
AskUserQuestion({
questions: [
{
question: "What is your app's monetisation model?",
header: "Monetisation",
options: [
{
label: "Freemium (IAP/Subscriptions)",
description: "Free download with in-app purchases or subscriptions",
},
{
label: "Paid Upfront",
description: "One-time purchase price to download the app",
},
{
label: "Free (No IAP)",
description: "Completely free with no monetisation",
},
],
multiSelect: false,
},
{
question: "Is this your first submission to Google Play?",
header: "First Release",
options: [
{
label: "Yes, first time",
description: "App has never been published to Play Store",
},
{
label: "No, updating existing app",
description: "App already exists on Play Store",
},
],
multiSelect: false,
},
{
question: "What testing track will you use?",
header: "Testing Track",
options: [
{
label: "Internal testing",
description: "Up to 100 testers, instant availability",
},
{
label: "Closed testing",
description: "Limited testers, requires review",
},
{
label: "Open testing",
description: "Anyone can join, requires review",
},
{
label: "Production",
description: "Public release to all users",
},
],
multiSelect: false,
},
{
question: "Do you want me to use browser automation to check Play Console?",
header: "Browser",
options: [
{
label: "Yes, use browser (Recommended)",
description: "I'll navigate Play Console and verify each item",
},
{
label: "No, walk me through manually",
description: "I'll provide a checklist for you to verify",
},
],
multiSelect: false,
},
],
});
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 662 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 9974755c4a13
android-preflight is a command published in the GitHub repository rahulkeerthi/expo-toolkit (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 4,748 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
android-preflight compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| android-preflightrahulkeerthi/expo-toolkit | Command | 5 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code |
| erne-animateJubaKitiashvili/everything-react-native-expo | Command | 50 | 29d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| react-nativegetsentry/toolkit | Command | 957 | yesterday | none | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| app-store-auditmjmirza/app-store-compliance | Command | 403 | yesterday | none | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| initialize-iosdefendend/Claude-ast-index-search | Command | 582 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 18 | Claude Code |
| mobile-performance-checktungnk123/mobile-best-practices | Command | 22 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |
| kmp-update-design-systemronjunevaldoz/kmp-agent-skills | Command | 6 | 12d ago | none | A | 34 | Claude Code |