Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-plugin/all)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-plugin/all"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-plugin/all.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00254 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00127 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00051 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
all scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to all — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Content Repurposing Plugin - All Commands
Here are all available commands and skills in this plugin:
Commands (Quick Actions)
/content-repurposing:extract- Extract content ideas from any source into a structured table/content-repurposing:linkedin- Generate LinkedIn posts from your content/content-repurposing:twitter- Generate Twitter/X threads from your content/content-repurposing:quotes- Extract quotable statements from your content/content-repurposing:titles- Generate compelling titles for your content
Skills (Auto-invoked by Claude)
- content-extraction - Full content idea extraction across all platforms
- key-takeaways - Summarize key takeaways into bullet lists
- linkedin-post - Create LinkedIn posts
- twitter-thread - Create Twitter/X threads
- quote-extractor - Pull quotable statements
- substack-note - Generate Substack Notes
- title-generator - Generate titles across platforms
Use any command with a file reference or paste content directly.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 27 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A c385ca5573e4
all is a command published in the GitHub repository Rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-plugin (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 254 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to all, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
all
Use when running all 6 PR quality gate agents locally before pushing. Provides comprehensive pre-push validation across security, QA, analysis, architecture, DevOps, and roadmap.
test
Prove it works. Multi-dimensional quality validation across functional, non-functional, security, DevOps, DX, and observability. Run after /build.
build
Build incrementally. Implement changes in thin vertical slices with TDD and atomic commits. Run after /plan.
qa
Use when performing local QA review before pushing PR changes. Evaluates test coverage, error handling, and code quality.
validate-pr-description
Use when validating a PR title and description for conventional commit format, issue linking keywords, and template compliance before submission.
analyst
Use when performing local analyst review before pushing PR changes. Assesses code quality, impact analysis, and maintainability.