Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-plugin/all)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-plugin/all"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-plugin/all/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-plugin/all"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-plugin/all.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00254 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00102 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00051 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
all scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to all — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Content Repurposing Plugin - All Commands
Here are all available commands and skills in this plugin:
Commands (Quick Actions)
/content-repurposing:extract- Extract content ideas from any source into a structured table/content-repurposing:linkedin- Generate LinkedIn posts from your content/content-repurposing:twitter- Generate Twitter/X threads from your content/content-repurposing:quotes- Extract quotable statements from your content/content-repurposing:titles- Generate compelling titles for your content
Skills (Auto-invoked by Claude)
- content-extraction - Full content idea extraction across all platforms
- key-takeaways - Summarize key takeaways into bullet lists
- linkedin-post - Create LinkedIn posts
- twitter-thread - Create Twitter/X threads
- quote-extractor - Pull quotable statements
- substack-note - Generate Substack Notes
- title-generator - Generate titles across platforms
Use any command with a file reference or paste content directly.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 27 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A c385ca5573e4
all is a command published in the GitHub repository Rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-plugin (6 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 254 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to all, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
validate
Run the release gate (validate --strict + pytest + evals) and report whether the repo is release-ready.
all
Use when running all 6 PR quality gate agents locally before pushing. Provides comprehensive pre-push validation across security, QA, analysis, architecture, DevOps, and roadmap.
eval-autonomous-agent
Generate a test harness for hallucination, bias, scope creep, and reward misalignment per FINRA 2026 guidelines.
review-skills
Review changed skills: automated bash checks + 9 structural dimensions (D1-D9) + 5 intent checks (M1-M5). PASS/FAIL verdict. Fix in-place.
bugfix
TDD-driven bugfix workflow: tester writes failing test (RED) → developer fixes (GREEN) → developer refactors (REFACTOR) → reviewer validates. Accepts issue number, description, or both. Asks before pushing and creating a PR; --no-pr commits locally without asking.
develop
Implement skill development issues with TDD-governed workflow.