Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/rami-code-review/claude-code-marketplace/upgradegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rami-code-review/claude-code-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rami-code-review/claude-code-marketplace/upgrade)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rami-code-review/claude-code-marketplace/upgrade"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rami-code-review/claude-code-marketplace/upgrade.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00093 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00046 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00019 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00009 |
Grade A, and why
upgrade scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 10 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 7c0d39fd7d06
upgrade is a command published in the GitHub repository rami-code-review/claude-code-marketplace (0 stars, last pushed 3d ago), with no licence file. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 93 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
adversarial-review
Run an adversarial Gemini code review that challenges the implementation approach and design choices.
review
Run a standard Gemini code review of recent git changes.
logic-fix-all
Autonomous audit-and-fix — after consent, scan the target, fix every logic issue found (all severities), verify each fix, and report anything unresolved.
verify-agent-report
エージェント完了報告の検証: 「$ARGUMENTS」で報告された branch / PR / commit / ファイルが実在するか、親セッション側のコマンド実行で裏取りする。.
logic-health
Sweep a whole codebase or directory for logic correctness — use before a release or to identify risk hotspots.
register-plugin-asset
新しい配布 command / agent / agent-skill を plugin manifest に登録し、検証シーケンスまで実行する.