Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RapierCraftStudios/ForgeDockWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rapiercraftstudios/forgedock/review-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rapiercraftstudios/forgedock/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rapiercraftstudios/forgedock/review-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rapiercraftstudios/forgedock/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rapiercraftstudios/forgedock/review-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.30608 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.12243 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.06122 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.03061 |
Grade D, and why
review-pr scanned grade D with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
type forge_resolve >/dev/null 2>&1 || { setopt nonomatch 2>/dev/null || true; FORGE_SOURCED_ROOT='${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}'; for _r in "$(cygpath -u "${FORGEDOCK_HOME:-}" 2>/dev/null || printf %s "${FORGEDOCK_HOME:-}")" '${ Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
trap 'git worktree remove --force "$REVIEW_WT" 2>/dev/null; rm -rf "$REVIEW_WT"' EXIT # removed on every exit path The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed c469d1337dec
- 7d ago Changed d92064bde176
- 13d ago Changed · +1 lines 9bcb8db56c0c
- 14d ago Changed · -1,875 lines a49ff9352a0a
- 18d ago Changed · +157 lines d3b4f46e92c0
- 19d ago Changed · +170 lines scan C → D 19c555801392
- 1mo ago First seen · 2,481 lines · 24 tokens per session scan C 106129cb585e
review-pr is a command published in the GitHub repository RapierCraftStudios/ForgeDock (119 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 30,608 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it D with 2 findings (reads agent configuration directories, recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-pr-ci
Review a pull request and post the review to GitHub (CI/automated use).
workflow-automate
Automate CI/CD pipelines, releases, and development workflows with GitHub Actions, pre-commit hooks, and infrastructure automation.
team-review
Launch a multi-reviewer parallel code review with specialized review dimensions.
pr-quality-gate-qa
You are a rigorous QA reviewer. Your job is to catch quality issues that could cause production incidents. Be skeptical and thorough.
pr-quality-gate-reliability
You are reviewing a pull request for production survivability: how the change behaves when its dependencies misbehave, time out, or fail.
pr-quality-gate-roadmap
You are reviewing a pull request for strategic alignment, feature scope, and product direction.