Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to RegardV/LegendaryTeam_For_Claude. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RegardV/LegendaryTeam_For_Claude/main/.claude/commands/review-queue.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RegardV/LegendaryTeam_For_ClaudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/regardv/legendaryteam_for_claude/review-queue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/regardv/legendaryteam_for_claude/review-queue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/regardv/legendaryteam_for_claude/review-queue.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00540 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00270 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00108 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
review-queue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Queue Management
Display and manage the human review queue for parallel autonomous operations.
What this command does
Shows all tasks waiting for human review, including:
- Tasks with uncertain confidence scores (40-69%)
- Security-critical tasks
- Architecture decisions
- Infrastructure changes
Usage
Run the review queue manager script and display the current queue:
node scripts/review-queue-manager.js list
Then provide a summary of:
- Number of tasks in queue
- Priority breakdown (high/medium/low)
- Type breakdown (security/architecture/infrastructure)
- Average wait time
- Recommended action for each task
Format the output in a user-friendly way with:
- Clear task descriptions
- Confidence scores
- Uncertainty reasons
- Links to detailed plans
- Approval/reject commands
Example format:
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ HUMAN REVIEW QUEUE - 3 Tasks Waiting ║
╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
🔴 [HIGH] OAuth 2.0 Integration
Confidence: 45%
Type: Security
Waiting: 12 minutes
Uncertainty:
• First-time OAuth implementation
• Security implications for user authentication
• New architectural pattern
Plan: thoughts/shared/plans/plan-oauth-security.md
To approve: /approve-task review-001
To reject: /reject-task review-001
🟡 [MED] Microservices Architecture
Confidence: 55%
Type: Architecture
Waiting: 8 minutes
Uncertainty:
• Major architectural change
• Team needs microservices training
• Cost implications ($350-750/month increase)
Plan: thoughts/shared/plans/plan-microservices-architecture.md
To approve: /approve-task review-002
To reject: /reject-task review-002
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Statistics:
• Total queued: 3 tasks
• Average wait: 10 minutes
• High priority: 1
• Medium priority: 2
• Low priority: 0
Meanwhile, 5 autonomous teams are working on high-confidence tasks in parallel!
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 86 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5f04378ee7c3
review-queue is a command published in the GitHub repository RegardV/LegendaryTeam_For_Claude (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 540 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
multi-repo-swarm
Coordinate AI swarms across multiple repositories, enabling organization-wide automation and intelligent cross-project collaboration.
repo-architect
Repository structure optimization and multi-repo management with ruv-swarm coordination for scalable project architecture and development workflows.
issue-tracker
Intelligent issue management and project coordination with ruv-swarm integration for automated tracking, progress monitoring, and team coordination.
camp-init
Create a new camp with the standard directory structure. A camp was previously called a campaign; camp init is the same command either way.
fest-show
Show festival progression (in-progress tasks, roadmap, and dependency view).
smart-agents
Automatically spawn the right agents at the right time without manual intervention.