Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ricoyudog/Coding_Corgi_flow. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ricoyudog/Coding_Corgi_flow/master/.claude/commands/corgi/review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ricoyudog/Coding_Corgi_flowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ricoyudog/coding_corgi_flow/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ricoyudog/coding_corgi_flow/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ricoyudog/coding_corgi_flow/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ricoyudog/coding_corgi_flow/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ricoyudog/coding_corgi_flow/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00185 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00074 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00037 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
Corgi: Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 11 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A e9d34ce2cfc5
Corgi: Review is a command published in the GitHub repository ricoyudog/Coding_Corgi_flow (104 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 185 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
impl-review
John Carmack-level implementation review via Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Claude or a host reviewer.
resolve-pr
Resolve PR review feedback — fetch unresolved threads, triage, dispatch resolver agents, reply + resolve via GraphQL.
cc-council
Comprehensive multi-agent council review with 6 protocols, 10 specialists, scoped scoring (per-scope thresholds and weights), state machine orchestration, auto-fix, and 50+ configuration flags.
review-team
Parallel code review with 3 specialist lenses plus the kit-default kit:advisor extra lens. Dispatches the security, architecture, and test-coverage lenses simultaneously, adds the cross-cutting kit:advisor (critique mode), then merges findings.
devs-team
Parallel multi-lens critique of a solution design (the active spec if present, else the decision brief). Dispatches 5 engineering lenses, merges findings, reports a verdict. Report-only, never blocks.
quiz-gate
The ★-tap NUDGE before merging a significant+worthy gate PR: a 5-question quiz built from the ACTUAL diff+tests, handed to the operator's configured teacher seam. Three logged responses (engage/defer/wave); advisory, never must-pass. Gates the human's attention, not the merge.