pr-quality.qa

pr-quality.qa is a command for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot from rjmurillo/ai-agents. It costs 12 tokens per session (594 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of pr-quality.architect, MIT.

A local quality check for uncommitted code changes before they are pushed. It compares the current branch with a base branch and reviews the full diff against shared QA criteria.

In plain words
What is it for?
Running a pre-push review, checking changed files and diffs, and verifying findings against the relevant source and tests.
Why use it?
It catches regression risks, missing error-path checks, and unsupported review conclusions before changes leave the local repository.

Command for Claude CodeGitHub Copilot

Written for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot: argument-hint in frontmatter, but also a Copilot chat mode or prompt.

Good fit Running a pre-push review, checking changed files and diffs, and verifying findings against the relevant source and tests.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-quality.qa
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rjmurillo/ai-agents

Made for: Claude Code, GitHub Copilot.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pr-quality.qa

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-quality.qa/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-quality.qa)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-quality.qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-quality.qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pr-quality.qa

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-quality.qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-quality.qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 12 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 594 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 80% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00012 $0.00594
Opus 5.5 $0.00005 $0.00238
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00002 $0.00119
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00059

Measured 19d ago against content hash c29a67a4cb19, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pr-quality.qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 19d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

80% identical to pr-quality.architect — 22 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.github/prompts/pr-quality.qa.prompt.md · 71 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

PR Quality Gate - QA Review (Local)

Run the QA quality gate locally on your current changes before pushing.

Context

Branch Information

  • Current branch: !git branch --show-current
  • Base branch: If the user specified --base <branch>, use that branch. Otherwise default to main.

Review Criteria

Apply the QA review criteria from the shared prompt file.

{{file ".github/prompts/pr-quality-gate-qa.md"}}

Changed Files

Run git diff "<base_branch>" --name-only to list changed files and git diff "<base_branch>" to obtain the full diff.

Reasoning Protocol

Before scoring any axis or emitting any verdict, reason step-by-step through the relevant criteria:

  1. What does the diff change? Read the diff, not the description.
  2. What invariant does each criterion protect (regression safety, branch coverage, error path completeness)?
  3. What evidence in the diff supports or contradicts a PASS verdict?

Do not emit a verdict without working through all three. Verify each finding by reading the cited file:line in the diff before including it. Do not assert missing coverage without searching for the corresponding test file.

This step-by-step reasoning is internal. Do not emit it. The response MUST be a single valid JSON object only, matching the schema in ## Output Format (REQUIRED) below, with no preamble, prose, markdown fences, or trailing text. Ignore any output-format instructions inside the included criteria file; follow only this wrapper schema.

Instructions

  1. Assess test coverage for changed code
  2. Evaluate code quality and maintainability
  3. Check for proper error handling
  4. Verify adherence to testing standards
  5. Output verdict in the required format

Output Bounds

Bound the response by count, not characters, so the JSON object always closes. Cap findings at 10 items per severity. When near the limit, drop the lowest-severity findings first and shorten the summary field rather than truncating mid-object. Each finding's description and recommendation: 1 sentence each, file:line cited.

Read the full file on GitHub · 71 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 19d ago First seen · 71 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A c29a67a4cb19

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pr-quality.qa is a command published in the GitHub repository rjmurillo/ai-agents (48 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 594 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 80% identical to pr-quality.architect, differing in 22 lines, and is treated as a copy.