Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/juliusz-cwiakalski/agentic-delivery-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/juliusz-cwiakalski/agentic-delivery-os/review-remote)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/juliusz-cwiakalski/agentic-delivery-os/review-remote"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/juliusz-cwiakalski/agentic-delivery-os/review-remote/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/juliusz-cwiakalski/agentic-delivery-os/review-remote"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/juliusz-cwiakalski/agentic-delivery-os/review-remote.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00617 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00247 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
review-remote scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
<output_format>
<what_to_return>Review findings summary (count, severity breakdown), the review-iter-<N>.yaml path under tmp/code-review/<branchPath>/, publish state (draft or published), and next action suggestion.</what_to_return>
</output_format>
<user_input>$ARGUMENTS</user_input>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 52 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A f6bded765530
review-remote is a command published in the GitHub repository juliusz-cwiakalski/agentic-delivery-os (43 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 617 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other commands, from other repositories
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
validate-pr-description
Use when validating a PR title and description for conventional commit format, issue linking keywords, and template compliance before submission.
review-pr-staging
Staging review mode — comprehensive review of staging branch before deploy to main.
pr-quality.qa
Run QA quality gate locally on uncommitted changes before pushing.
pr-quality-gate-qa
You are a rigorous QA reviewer. Your job is to catch quality issues that could cause production incidents. Be skeptical and thorough.
pr-quality-gate-agent-safety
You are reviewing a pull request for agent-safety risk: changes that alter how an autonomous agent behaves, what it can run, or what guardrails it must clear before acting.