rossum-agents: Command for Claude Code

.claude/commands/ds-review-landing-page.md

ds-review-landing-page is a command for Claude Code from rossumai/rossum-agents. It costs 0 tokens per session (691 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command for reviewing and improving a website landing page and its blog pages. It compares the blog with the main page so the site feels like one consistent product across desktop and mobile.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit the specified HTML landing page and blog directory. It helps improve layout, typography, colours, spacing, navigation, responsive behaviour, accessibility, and writing tone.
Why use it?
Landing pages can lose visitors through unclear structure, weak calls to action, poor readability, or inconsistent styling. The review also checks accessibility, including keyboard and screen-reader use.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: names the AskUserQuestion tool.

This is rossumai/rossum-agents's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on rossum-agents itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything rossum-agents configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to rossumai/rossum-agents. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rossumai/rossum-agents/master/.claude/commands/ds-review-landing-page.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rossumai/rossum-agents

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ds-review-landing-page

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rossumai/rossum-agents/ds-review-landing-page/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rossumai/rossum-agents/ds-review-landing-page)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rossumai/rossum-agents/ds-review-landing-page"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rossumai/rossum-agents/ds-review-landing-page/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ds-review-landing-page

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rossumai/rossum-agents/ds-review-landing-page"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rossumai/rossum-agents/ds-review-landing-page.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 691 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00691
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00345
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00138
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00069

Measured 12d ago against content hash 65605978f247, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ds-review-landing-page scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/ds-review-landing-page.md · 90 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 90 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review & Improve Landing Page

Goal: Audit docs/landing/index.html and docs/landing/blog/ from Staff UX Designer and Web Developer perspective, then implement approved improvements.

Scope

Path Content
docs/landing/index.html Main landing page
docs/landing/blog/ Blog posts and related assets

Consistency Requirements

Blog pages must maintain visual and structural consistency with the main landing page:

Element Requirement
Typography Same font families, sizes, and weights
Colors Identical color palette and usage patterns
Spacing Consistent margins, padding, and whitespace
Components Reuse header, footer, and navigation styles
Responsive Same breakpoints and mobile behavior
Tone Consistent voice and writing style

Review blog pages against the main landing page as the source of truth for design decisions.

Review Dimensions

Dimension Focus Areas
UX Design Visual hierarchy, cognitive load, CTAs, whitespace, cross-device readability (desktop + mobile)
Accessibility WCAG 2.1 AA compliance, keyboard navigation, screen reader support, color contrast
Performance Asset loading, CSS efficiency, render-blocking resources, image optimization
SEO Meta tags, semantic HTML, structured data, Open Graph
Code Quality HTML semantics, CSS organization, JS patterns, maintainability

Review Checklist

Category Check For
Visual hierarchy Clear F-pattern or Z-pattern flow, proper heading levels
CTAs Prominent, actionable, appropriate contrast ratios
Mobile Touch targets ≥44px, no horizontal scroll, readable without zoom, tested for iPhone/Android viewports
Readability Font sizes, line lengths, contrast readable on both desktop and mobile devices
Accessibility Alt text, ARIA labels, focus states, skip links, landmark regions
Performance Inline critical CSS, lazy loading images, minification opportunity
Semantics Appropriate HTML5 elements, no div-soup, logical document outline
CSS No unused rules, consistent naming, efficient selectors
Interactive Keyboard accessible, visible focus, no motion for reduced-motion users

Read the full file on GitHub · 90 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 90 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 65605978f247

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ds-review-landing-page is a command published in the GitHub repository rossumai/rossum-agents (11 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 691 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.